Nurul Izzah and Saifuddin cleared


PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has held that Permatang Pauh MP Nurul Izzah Anwar and Datuk Saifuddin Nasution Ismail did not defame the National Feedlot Corporation Sdn Bhd (NFCorp) and its chairman.

In a unanimous decision, a three-man panel chaired by Federal Court judge Justice Datuk Seri Mohd Zawawi Salleh dismissed the appeal by NFCorp and Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Salleh Ismail and ordered them to pay RM50,000 in costs to Nurul Izzah and Saifuddin, who was sued in his capacity as the PKR secretary-general.

Other judges on the Bench were Justices Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim and Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal.

NFCorp and Salleh had sued Nurul Izzah for her statements made at a press conference in Parliament during her time as the Lembah Pantai MP in 2012, related to the company’s planned purchase of eight condominium units at KL Eco City using RM71.4mil of government funds as leverage some nine years ago.

The statements were made based on an exposé by PKR’s former director of strategy Mohd Rafizi Ramli of how the public funds in the NFC project had been used as leverage to secure loans for the purchase of the properties.

Justice Harmindar, who read the ruling, said the court found that the impugned statement, when read in its entirety, was not defamatory of the appellants but instead were aimed at Salleh’s wife Tan Sri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, who is also a former Lembah Pantai MP.

“In our assessment, such person (a reader) will not pay any attention to the alleged defamatory matter complained of which was in effect one sentence in a very long press statement concerning the wife of the plaintiff.

“That one sentence was meant to be only a precursor or introduction to the main sting in that it was the revelation by Rafizi of the misuse of funds that led to the first defendant (Nurul Izzah) raising new questions about the conflict of interest of Shahrizat in the purchase of the condominiums.

“No action has since been filed by Shahrizat in respect to these allegations although a suit was filed against Rafizi for the statements that he had made, ” Justice Harmindar said here yesterday.

The court said the leave questions by the appellants were not required to be answered as they were irrelevant for the case before them and the courts below were entitled to come to their findings on the issue.“The orders made by the courts below are hereby affirmed, ” he said.

NFCorp and Salleh were represented by lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, while Nurul Izzah and Saifuddin were represented by lawyers Razlan Hadri Zulkifli and Datuk Joshua Kevin.

NFCorp and Salleh filed the defamation suit on Dec 24,2013, against Nurul Izzah and Saifuddin, claiming that Nurul Izzah had made a slanderous statement on KiniTV on March 7,2012.

On March 4,2016, the Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed their lawsuit after ruling that the statement, when read as a whole, was not defamatory to NFCorp and Salleh.NFCorp and Salleh then lost their appeal at the Court of Appeal on July 10,2017.

On March 8,2018, NFCorp and Salleh obtained leave to proceed with their appeal to the Federal Court with two legal questions for the court’s determination.

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 46
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
   

Next In Nation

Kelantan records highest infectivity rate in Malaysia
Bomba rescues elderly couple from Skudai house hit by flash floods
Covid-19: 2,195 new cases bring total to 375,054
Police investigating argument in Klang fast food restaurant
Sabah yet to decide on federal recalibration plan for illegal migrants
No special treatment given to suspect in bodyguard assault case, say cops
439,286 individuals have completed two-dose Covid-19 vaccination, says Health Minister
Cops currently seizing property from main suspect in bodyguard-beating case
Over 3,200 officers roped in to monitor price hikes, says Domestic Trade Ministry
Warisan-Muda a good platform, wait for the announcement, say Shafie and Syed Saddiq

Stories You'll Enjoy


Vouchers