Opinion: Meta and Twitter show the drawbacks of giving self-satisfied billionaires too much power


As has been the case for the last year, the problem seems to be Zuckerberg’s inability to articulate where he’s leading his company as it undergoes transitions on multiple fronts. — AFP

Back in the prehistoric era – in 2012, when Facebook staged one of the most hyped initial public stock offerings of all time – I warned the company’s newly minted shareholders that they had become wedded to Mark Zuckerberg.

Then 28, the company founder became one of the most deeply entrenched chief executives in American business. Facebook’s two-class stock structure allowed Zuckerberg to control 57% of all shareholder votes despite owning only about 28% of all its shares.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Tech News

Group of WTO states agrees not to impose e-commerce duties
Netflix searches for franchises after losing out on Harry Potter
Humanoid robots offer Europe path to stay in tech race
Amazon eyes $9 billion Globalstar deal to rival SpaceX's Starlink, FT reports
Ahead of Greek social media ban, parents desperate to separate children from phones
It’s International Fact-Checking Day. Refresh your AI identification skills
Meta, YouTube verdict escalates calls for teen social media limits
AI machine sorts clothes faster than humans to boost textile recycling in China
Anthropic rushes to limit leak of Claude Code source code
Seeking a sounding board? Beware the eager-to-please chatbot.

Others Also Read