PETALING JAYA: There is a need for clear justification over delays in the Negri Sembilan state assembly meeting, experts say, noting that constitutional requirements on procedure must be observed.
Lawyer Mohamad Zainuddin Omar, who is well-versed in the state constitution, said the events on Thursday may raise a constitutional issue.
“It may be an issue as to whether it qualifies as a valid first meeting following the previous session,” he said.
Mohamad Zainuddin said under Article 56(1) of the state constitution, the Ruler summons the state assembly, with the Ruler comprising the Yang di-Pertuan Besar and the ruling chiefs – Undang Luak and Tunku Besar of Tampin.
“In the latest development on April 23, Undang Yang Empat decreed that the opening ceremony be delayed to ensure its legitimacy, pending completion of legal and customary processes relating to the royal installation,” he said.
“In these circumstances, it may be appropriate for the Undang to seek an order of mandamus to enforce their prerogative under Article 10, and for the newly elected Ruler to assume his position as provided under Article 7 of the state constitution.”
This follows the Undang Luak’s decision on April 19 to remove the current Yang di-Pertuan Besar, citing alleged misconduct.
Mohamad Zainuddin explained that the Mentri Besar has no constitutional standing to challenge whether a “full and complete enquiry” under Article 10 has been properly conducted by the Undang.
He said Yang di-Pertuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir is the proper party to challenge the validity of the Undang’s decision in court.
“The decision of the Undang must be treated as valid unless and until set aside by court. However, the court may also find the issue non-justiciable due to protections under Article 71 of the Federal Constitution,” he said.
The comments come after the Negri Sembilan state legislative assembly was adjourned on Thursday to a later date, following the royal address by Tuanku Muhriz.
Political analyst Prof Datuk Dr Sivamurugan Pandian of Universiti Sains Malaysia said prolonged delays without clear explanation could raise questions on accountability, transparency and legislative oversight.
He said while assemblies are expected to meet regularly to ensure proper governance, the postponement does not automatically signal instability.
“At this stage, the delay could reflect administrative adjustments, scheduling issues or efforts to manage legislative priorities,” he said.
“However, politically, any delay will naturally invite speculation on internal coordination and the timing of sensitive issues.”
Sivamurugan said even a short postponement is usually acceptable if carried out within legal procedures, but it may still prompt questions on coordination between the Yang di-Pertuan Besar, the Undang and the Mentri Besar, given the state’s unique constitutional structure.
The Negri Sembilan assembly postponement is the second such case, following a similar move in Perlis recently.
