Khalid Samad fails to get leave for defamation suit appeal


PUTRAJAYA: Former federal territories minister Khalid Abdul Samad (pic) has failed in his bid for leave to proceed with his appeal at the Federal Court against a Court of Appeal decision setting aside RM80,000 in damages awarded to him for defamation.

A Federal Court three-member panel comprising Justices Tan Sri Rohana Yusuf, Datuk Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal and Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah dismissed Khalid's appeal in online proceedings on Monday (Oct 17) and ordered him to pay RM30,000 in costs.

Justice Rohana, who led the panel, said the court had considered all submissions and found that Khalid's application did not meet the requisite condition to be given leave.

Khalid had sued former Malaysia Islamic Strategic Research Institute (Iksim) chief executive officer Prof Datuk Mahamad Naser Disa for defamation over the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) (Amendment) Bill 2016 or RUU355.

On July 17, 2019, the High Court ruled in Khalid's favour and ordered Mahamad Naser to pay him RM80,000.

On Jan 28 this year, the Court of Appeal allowed Mahamad Naser's appeal to set aside the High Court's decision, prompting Khalid to file for leave to pursue his appeal to the Federal Court.

Khalid filed a suit against Mahamad Naser in December 2017 claiming that he (Mahamad Naser) made malicious statements against him in a seminar organised by the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (JAIS) on Sept 28, 2017 at the Tengku Ampuan Jemaah Mosque, Bukit Jelutong in Shah Alam.

Khalid claimed that Mahamad Naser had, in a lecture titled "Discourse on current issues and Selangor state legislation: Doctrine: Challenges and Constitution", had among other matters stated that Khalid was strongly against RUU355, against the implementation of Islamic law including hudud, and opposed efforts to empower the Syariah Courts.

High Court Judicial Commissioner Rohani Ismail, who found for Khalid in her decision, held that the court found no evidence indicating that he had issued a statement he was against RUU355.

Khalid was represented by lawyer Muhammad Faiz Fadzil while Datuk Hasnal Rezua Merican acted for Mahamad Naser. – Bernama

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Public Service Department adopts Pulau Aman as Madani Village with RM2.5mil allocation
Cops question English portal reporter over casino claims
S'gor cops nab man over acid attack on national footballer Faisal Halim
KKB Polls: Indian voters will make the difference, says Hulu S'gor MP
King, Queen arrive in Singapore for maiden state visit
Duo nabbed in Taiping with more than RM262,000 worth of drugs
Investments in new ideas, resources vital to address non-traditional security threats, says minister
PM wants civil servants to maintain integrity to justify salary increase by govt
KKB Polls: Two men to be charged for displaying King's photo, says IGP
Nizra Industries hopes to impress RMAF with air traffic control showcase

Others Also Read