Different audit firms have different requirements, 1MDB trial hears


PUTRAJAYA: A former 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) chairman downplayed the refusal of audit firm KPMG to sign off on the company's financials in 2013, chalking it up to each auditor's "different requirements".

Tan Sri Che Lodin Wok Kamaruddin testified that the reason behind KPMG's refusal to sign was a disagreement on the processes.

"First, there was a delay. Then there was a disagreement (on) how it should be done," the witness said during cross-examination by DPP Kamal Baharin Omar at the RM2.28bil 1MDB trial involving Datuk Seri Najib Razak here on Monday (March 3).

The court had heard in previous proceedings that KPMG refused to sign off on 1MDB's 2013 financials as it could not verify the authenticity of the fund's US$2.3bil investment in Brazen Sky Ltd.

DPP Kamal Baharin: Why did KPMG delay its signing?

Che Lodin: I think the issue centred on KPMG not agreeing with our suggestion that they should go to Hong Kong to see for themselves our investment in Brazen Sky.

The witness also agreed that a meeting was called at Najib's residence in Langgak Duta here with KPMG, including the firm's then managing partner Datuk Johan Idris, over the matter on Dec 31, 2013.

"I was there (at the meeting)," he said.

DPP Kamal Baharin: What was requested by Datuk Johan?

Che Lodin: They wanted to look at this investment in Brazen Sky in the form of a segregated portfolio. I'm not an accountant or an auditor, so I'm not too familiar with what they wanted.

Che Lodin also told the court that KPMG was being "unfair" to 1MDB when it requested additional documents on the investment.

"I said, go take a look (at the investment) yourself," he added.

KPMG's refusal to sign ultimately resulted in its removal as the company's auditor by 1MDB's board of directors.

It was later replaced with another audit firm, Deloitte.

"When we changed to Deloitte, they were happy to sign off (on the financials).

"Maybe KPMG has requirements unique to its standards that are not necessarily a (universal) requirement," Che Lodin said.

On Oct 30 last year, the High Court ordered Najib to enter his defence on four counts of using his position to obtain RM2.28bil gratification from 1MDB's funds and 21 counts of money laundering involving the same amount.

The hearing will continue before Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah on Tuesday (March 4).

 

 

 

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Police probing alleged abuse at elderly care centre
Perikatan component parties submit seat preferences for upcoming Johor election
Johor polls: Seat negotiations over halfway done for Perikatan, says Annuar Musa
Diesel announcement an attempt to buy votes, says Dr Wee
Bersatu objects to Parti Cinta Malaysia’s admission into PN, cites irregularities
Purse dispute sparks bloody Jasin brawl: Two men critically injured
Almost RM110mil allocated to help workers remain competitive in AI-drive job landscape, says HR Minister
Immigration passport services affected by system maintenance at 71 offices
Eight injured in multi-vehicle pileup on north-south expressway near Gopeng
Government tables Competition (Amendment) Bill 2026 to enhance market fairness

Others Also Read