The Hague court rules in Malaysia’s favour


PETALING JAYA: The Hague Court of Appeal has dismissed the Sulu claimants bid against Malaysia on three grounds, even stating that Spanish arbitrator Dr Gonzalo Stampa should have immediately ceased all arbitration activities after the Madrid Court nullified his appointment.

According to the Dutch court, the final arbitral award given to the eight individuals claiming to be heirs of the Sulu Sultanate on Feb 28 last year in France must be refused.

“Firstly, the judgment of the Spanish High Court of Justice of June 29, 2021 must be recognised in the Dutch legal order, so that it is established that the final arbitral award could not be made and is therefore not eligible for recognition and enforcement,” said the judgment.

This was in reference to the move on June 29, 2021 by the High Court of Justice of Madrid which nullified the judicial appointment of Stampa as an arbitrator.

In its judgment yesterday, the court agreed with the argument that Stampa should have immediately ceased all arbitration activities after the Madrid Court nullified his appointment and that he lacked the authority to continue.

Secondly, The Hague Court of Appeal said the 1878 agreement between the now defunct Sulu Sultanate and the British North Borneo Company did not contain an arbitration clause.

“Thirdly, the suspension of the final arbitral award by the Paris Court means that recognition and enforcement will be refused.

“Needless to say, the court considers that even if it were assumed that a valid final arbitral award has been rendered, this award cannot be recognised in the Netherlands because there are several grounds for refusal.”

The judgment, which was in Dutch, said the court was of the opinion that the agreement concluded in 1878 does not contain an arbitration clause.

The court also affirmed the Paris Court of Appeal’s decision on June 6 this year that Dr Stampa did not have the jurisdiction and his appointment as an arbitrator was incompetent, thus annulling the final award.

It ordered the claimants to pay Malaysia the court cost and legal fees amounting to €18,960 (RM96,853).

In the previous court case in France, Malaysia was also awarded €100,000 (RM492,000).

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Thailand to open new border crossing with Malaysia to boost trade, logistics, and tourism
Durian Tunggal fatal shooting: Explain eight-month prosecution delay, Gobind told AG
Kuala Terengganu MP admitted to IJN following health issues in Parliament
Johor polls: Early voter turnout at 94.49pc, says EC
Johor polls: KTMB offers additional 7,464 ETS tickets with 20% discounts
Act amendments in the works to resolve Felda second-generation housing crisis, says PM
Actress held after allegedly testing positive for meth in KL entertainment outlet raid
Johor polls: Strong transportation demands encouraging sign of voter turnout
MACC seeks local woman to help in investigations
49 out of 57 plead not guilty to criminal conspiracy charges

Others Also Read