Najib's final SRC appeal: Bid to postpone hearing fails

PUTRAJAYA: Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has failed in his final bid to stay his appeal in the SRC International Sdn Bhd trial at the Federal Court.

A five-member panel of judges dismissed an oral application made by his lead counsel, Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, who was seeking a three- to four-month adjournment.

ALSO READ: Najib wants ‘newfound info’ added

Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who chaired the panel, said the change in law firms at the eleventh hour by the Pekan MP was done with full knowledge of the hearing dates (Aug 15-26) since April.

Najib had discharged Messrs Shafee & Co on July 25 and subsequently engaged Messrs Zaid Ibrahim Suflan TH Liew & Partners (ZIST).

ALSO READ: Najib's final SRC appeal: Apex court stands down to mull over new evidence bid

"This is his right to do so but he cannot, after having made that decision, turn around and say that his new lawyers are not ready to proceed with the hearing of the appeals. The new lawyers too, having accepted the brief, are not entitled to say they need more time to prepare knowing fully well that the dates had been fixed well in advance," the Chief Justice said here on Tuesday.

In this regard, the panel referred to Rule 6(a) of the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978.

ALSO READ: Najib's final SRC appeal: Defence bid to admit fresh evidence 'flawed and self-serving', says prosecution

The code stipulates that "an advocate and solicitor shall not accept any brief unless he is reasonably certain of being able to appear and represent the client on the required day".

The court was also of the opinion that the request for adjournment was not supported by cogent nor reasonable grounds and that considerable public funds would be wasted had the adjournment been allowed.

ALSO READ: Najib's final SRC appeal: Real danger concerning presiding judge's impartiality, says defence

"Article 8 of the Federal Constitution and the Rule of Law demand that the appellant be treated just like any other accused.

"As such, we state again that while the appellant is entitled to his right to change his counsel, he is not entitled to make this choice at the expense of the court, the prosecution or the entire justice system," said Chief Justice Tengku Maimun.

ALSO READ: Najib's final SRC appeal: Apex court rejects application to adduce fresh evidence

Earlier, Hisyam made a passionate plea to stay the hearing of the appeal proper, citing time constraints as Najib had changed his line-up of defence lawyers last month.

The court also ordered for the hearing of the main appeal to begin this Thursday (Aug 18).

ALSO READ: Najib's final SRC appeal: Chief Justice Tengku Maimun heads five-judge panel of Federal Court

On July 28, 2020, Justice Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali (now a Court of Appeal judge) convicted and sentenced Najib on seven charges involving criminal breach of trust (CBT), money laundering and abuse of position, involving SRC funds, totalling RM42mil.

He was sentenced to 12 years' jail and a fine of RM210mil.

The conviction and sentence were upheld by the Court of Appeal.

Article type: free
User access status:
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!

Next In Nation

Two trawlers impounded, 19 Vietnamese arrested for trespassing, illegal fishing
Global aviation has to look beyond the impact of the pandemic, says Dr Wee
Stable govt crucial for country's economic recovery, says biz group
KJ: Decriminalising suicide bids up to Cabinet, Home Ministry and cops' input also crucial
You can now disable PayDirect on your Touch ‘n Go ewallet
TnG NFC cards being sold at exorbitant prices on online platforms
KJ: Increase in suicides and mental health issues troubling, prompt action needed
Malaysia's average life expectancy at birth drops to 73.4 years
Cops urge complainant in robbery case to come forward
Motorcycle theft gang busted, six nabbed

Others Also Read