Sabah Dapsy chief supports call for anti-hopping law

  • Nation
  • Saturday, 25 Jul 2020

KOTA KINABALU: The revisiting of the anti-hopping law for Sabah is something that needs to be seriously looked into, especially in this unstable political scenario in the state and country, says DAP’s Phoong Jin Zhe.

The state DAP’s Youth wing (Dapsy) chief said he supports the call for this anti-hopping law as party hopping among elected assemblymen has become a norm in Sabah.

“It is an open secret that Malaysian politics and more notoriously, Sabah politics has always been plagued by the culture of horse-trading for personal gratification or political mileage, ” he said in a statement here on Saturday (July 25).

This comes after Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal said they may relook at the anti-hopping law for Sabah.

Phoong said this can be seen even more so recently where allegations have surfaced of "political agents" showing up at the doors of state assemblymen, offering positions and money for them to support the Opposition bloc.

He said there was nothing novel with such a law as other state governments, namely Penang which has already enacted such a law under Article 14(A)(1) of the Constitution of the State of Penang (Amendment) Enactment 2012.

He said Selangor had also during its state assembly recently tabled a motion for the same provision to be made into law at the Federal level.

Article 10 of the Federal Constitution - freedom to associate, I would like to offer my five cents, ” Phoong said.

He said the freedoms guaranteed under Article 10 namely, (1)(a) freedom of speech and expression, (1)(b) right to assembly peaceably and without arms, and (1)(c) right to form associations, are not absolute rights in that their limitations.

He said specifically on the constitutionality of anti-hopping law, the point of contention being that such a law would infringe Article 10(1)(c), he feels that when a member of the public sets himself up as a representative of the people, his mandate must be limited to that which he has promised to carry out, either by his promises or the party manifesto he contested under.

“In other words, an elected assemblyman or MP must represent the people under the party which he or she had contested in the election, ” Phoong said.

He said if the representative wishes to switch alliance or parties, he should vacate his seat and return the mandate to the people for them to decide if he is worthy to represent them again under a different party.

He said Article 10(2) stated clearly that Parliament may, by law, impose such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the federation or any part thereof, public order or morality.

“In light of allegations of harassment and door-to-door threats on several Sabah assemblymen recently, I submit that an anti-hopping law is justified on the account of public order and morality, and is therefore constitutional, ” Phoong said.

An earlier anti-hopping law in Sabah was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1992.

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights

Next In Nation

EMCO at two localities in Pahang, Perak ends on Saturday (Oct 16)
Perak destinations bracing for huge crowds
Sundra Rajoo files suit against Tommy Thomas, 12 others over alleged wrongful arrest, prosecution
Water supply in Klang Valley restored by 85% as of 6pm Friday (Oct 15), says Air Selangor
Najib's stay bid in 1MDB US$8bil civil suit to be heard next year
Adopting green tech in transport sector will help Malaysia achieve sustainability goals, says Dr Wee
Shorter quarantine duration for fully-vaxxed close contacts, international arrivals from Monday (Oct 18)
Sabah Speaker to decide on Warisan’s push for Sindumin seat vacancy after rep revokes pre-signed resignation letter
Look at health budgets as investment, not expenditure, says Khairy
High Court sets Dec 15, 16 to hear Indira Gandhi's suit against IGP and govt

Others Also Read