Court allows Naimah's bid to quash RM313.8mil additional tax assessment notice


SHAH ALAM: The High Court here allowed the judicial review application by Toh Puan Na’imah Abdul Khalid, the wife of former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin, to quash an additional tax assessment notice amounting to RM313.8mil issued by the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN).

Judge Evawani Farisyta Mohammad ruled that the LHDN had acted beyond its jurisdiction under the Income Tax Act 1967 when it issued the additional assessment notice dated Aug 13, 2024, for the 2018 assessment year.

She said the Income Tax Act 1967 applied only to income earned in Malaysia and foreign-sourced income remitted into Malaysia, while the assets in dispute were Na’imah’s properties abroad and did not constitute income received in the country.

"Based on the reasons stated, the court hereby allows the applicant’s judicial review application with costs,” she said in the grounds of judgment shared with the media.

The judge also ruled that the additional assessment notice was unlawful as the amount of share ownership involved had previously been assessed through the joint assessment of Na’imah and the late Daim for the 2018 assessment year.

According to Evawani Farisyta, the LHDN’s action had resulted in double taxation, contrary to the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1967.

She also ruled that the market value of assets abroad could not be treated as taxable income solely by reason of ownership, as such a provision is not provided for under the Income Tax Act 1967.

The judge said that if the LHDN was of the view that income had not been declared when the assets were acquired in the 1990s, the appropriate assessment should have been made for that period rather than for the 2018 assessment year.

Evawani Farisyta also found it unreasonable for the LHDN to require Na’imah to submit documents pertaining to assets acquired more than 20 years ago, as the Income Tax Act 1967 only mandates that taxpayers keep such records for seven years.

She held that the failure to furnish documents that were no longer legally obliged to keep could not justify the issuance of an additional assessment notice.

Na’imah was represented by S. Saravana Kumar, Nur Amira Ahmad Azhar and Dharshini Sharma, while the LHDN was represented by senior revenue counsel Marina Ibrahim and Fatimah Roslan.

In her application, Na’imah sought to challenge the additional assessment notice issued by the LHDN on Aug 13, 2024, over three overseas assets allegedly used in the settlement of loans between Ilham Baru Sdn Bhd and Ilham Tower Sdn Bhd and Welberton Private Equity Corp under a settlement agreement dated Jan 18, 2018.

Previously,  the same court dismissed an application by Na’imah for an interim stay against an order requiring her to pay RM313.82mil in income tax arrears to the LHDN.

The court found no exceptional circumstances warranting the stay, emphasising that the respondent (LHDN) holds the legal authority to enforce tax collection under the Income Tax Act 1967.

However, on Oct 28, 2024, the Court of Appeal unanimously allowed Na’imah’s application for a temporary stay of payment of RM313.82mil in income tax arrears to the LHDN pending the disposal of her appeal.- Bernama

 

 

 

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Na'imah , LHDN , high court , judicial review , shah alam

Next In Nation

PAS ulama council welcomes Kelantan govt's move to table Syariah Criminal Offences Bill
Ex-PM Ismail Sabri to be charged at KL Sessions Court tomorrow
Three policemen killed in Beaufort, believed electrocuted
Umno sees surge in online membership among youths after Negri polls
Negri Umno chief denies attempting to oust new MB
Coming Sarawak polls should include 17 new proposed seats, says GPS sec-gen
Nurul Izzah tries to quit as PKR deputy president, told to take a break instead, says Fahmi
'Datuk Red', company ordered to pay RM1.57mil in Sungai Semangkis land suit
Fire damages gazebo, part of house in Tanjung Karang, no injuries reported
Kota Tinggi cops issue 22 summonses for heavy vehicle offences

Others Also Read