Malaysian Bar sues govt, cops over protest against MACC probe on judge


KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Bar and its office bearers have sued the police and the government for alleged wrongful detention when they were barred from proceeding with their "Walk For Judicial Independence" to Parliament on June 17.

The walk was organised as a peaceful protest against the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's (MACC) investigations into Court of Appeal judge Justice Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali, who convicted former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case.

The four office bearers are Bar president Karen Cheah, vice-president Mohamad Ezri Abdul Wahab, secretary Anand Raj R. Balasupramaniam and treasurer Murshidah Mustafa, who filed the writ of summons through Messrs Amerbon in the High Court here on Oct 20.

ALSO READ: Police form human chain to prevent lawyers from leaving Padang Merbok

They named Noor Dellhan Yahaya (in his capacity as the officer in charge of the Dang Wangi police district), Nuzulan Mohd Din (in his capacity as the head of criminal investigation at the Dang Wangi district headquarters), the police, the Inspector-General of Police, the Home Minister and the government of Malaysia as the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth defendants respectively.

According to the statement of claim, the plaintiffs said about 500 members of the Malaysian Bar assembled peacefully at Padang Merbok for the march between 7.45am and 10am on June 17, where they planned to march to Parliament to submit a memorandum to the then deputy minister (Parliament and Law) in the Prime Minister's Department, Datuk Mas Ermieyati Samsudin.

The plaintiffs said the police had placed plastic barriers around Padang Merbok to prevent the participants from entering or passing through.

After speeches by Bar members on stage, around 10.35am, the participants tried to march to Parliament but were stopped by police who formed a human chain and prevented the march.

ALSO READ: Justice walk ends peacefully after memorandum handed over to deputy minister

The plaintiffs claimed that the participants were falsely restrained and imprisoned between 10.35am and 11.15am by the defendants, when they were forcibly confined at the Padang Merbok car park within the barricades constructed by police under the direction of the first defendant.

As a result, the plaintiffs claimed to have suffered loss of freedom for 40 minutes, and their constitutional rights under Articles 5, 8, 9 and 10 of the Federal Constitution were violated.

They further claimed that the defendants breached their statutory duties under the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 and committed misfeasance in public office.

The plaintiffs are claiming special damages of RM19,449, and unspecified general, aggravated and exemplary damages as well as other reliefs deemed fit by the court.

Case management has been fixed on Jan 12.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Man claims trial to 12 counts of armed robbery, cheating in Klang
KWAP eFishery probe: 10 witnesses have given statements so far, says MACC chief
Fix it STAT!: Govt's Chief Secretary calls immediate action on critical service issues at PPUM
MACC, PETRONAS strengthen cooperation on anti-corruption efforts
Najib's daughter sends him birthday wishes
Sabah hospital sexual harassment allegations probed before it went viral, says state police chief
Sabah cops arrest over 13,000, seize RM263mil worth of drugs in first six months of 2026
Negri polls: Dissatisfaction among Umno grassroots to be resolved before polling day, says Zahid
Negri polls: Political cooperation must benefit all rakyat, says Amanah comms director
Benefits outweigh cost of appointing deputy executive councillors, says Johor govt

Others Also Read