IPOH: Forest harvesting activities in Perak are only implemented in Permanent Forest Reserve (PFR) areas classified as Production Forests based on the Annual Felling Ration (CTT) set by the National Land Council (NLC).
Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad said for the 12th Malaysia Plan (2021-2025), the CTT approved was 33,000ha, or at a rate of 6,600ha per year, while for 2019, the CTT was 8,058ha.
The CTT for 2020 and 2021 were 6,642ha and 5,337ha respectively.
“Compliance with the PFR area for logging is in line with NLC’s decision to ensure sustainability and stability of timber supply sources in Perak,” he said at the state assembly sitting here yesterday.
Saarani said this in reply to Aminuddin Zulkipli (PH-Behrang) who wanted to know the size of forest reserve areas allowed for logging that had been approved from 2019 to 2021, and the current status of those areas.
Aminuddin also wanted to know the strategic measures implemented to overcome pollution in forest areas for rain catchment and watershed areas in Perak as a result of timber exploitation.
Saarani said the current status of the forest reserve areas approved for logging in 2019 was 8,058ha, where all areas had been logged, and as for 2020, a total of 6,182ha had been felled, with another 460ha still being worked on.
“For 2021, only 5,337ha have been approved for logging, with 1,334ha already cleared, while 4,003ha are still in the works.
“The licensing process is in accordance with the Selective Management System (SMS) which is implemented systematically and controlled under Sustainable Forest Management,” he said.
According to Saarani, there had been no pollution in the water catchment area so far because it was classified as a Protected Forest and also an Environmentally Sensitive Area (KSAS).
He said mitigation measures would be taken to overcome river pollution in the PFR areas, where every forest development activity was required to establish a buffer zone with a width of at least 10m on both sides of the river to reduce the impact from water run-off.
Saarani said remedial action would take into account the views of technical agencies such as the Department of Environment (DOE) and Drainage and Irrigation Department (DID), while the state Forestry Department would implement tree-planting in the cleared areas.
“DOE always monitors activities that are subject to the Environmental Quality (Prescribed Activities) (Environmental Impact Assessment) (EIA) Order 2015, Environmental Quality Act (AKAS) 1974.
“There are 32 forestry projects with EIA approval based on DOE records from 2015 to 2021 that needed to implement several measures, including Preparation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and Land-Disturbing Pollution Prevention and Mitigation Measures (LD-P2M2) for the purpose of erosion and siltation control.
“In addition, the projects need to appoint an environmental officer who is responsible for matters related to environmental management and monitor work in accordance with EIA conditions.
“The implementation of Third Party Environmental Audits and reporting to DOE on any non-compliance as well as pro-active remedial measures and reporting on environmental monitoring to DOE on a regular basis (once every three months) must also be done,” he said.
If there is a violation of the conditions of approval, the holder of the EIA approval may be subject to action under Section 34A (7), AKAS 1974, and DOE may also impose a Prohibition Order to stop the development of a forestry activity subject to the EIA, as provided for under Section 34AA (1). — Bernama
Already a subscriber? Log in
Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access
Cancel anytime. Ad-free. Unlimited access with perks.
