'Amber Heard slings an exceptional amount of mud': Johnny Depp's team scoffs at mistrial request


By AGENCY

Johnny Depp's team is arguing that Amber Heard's claim is "based on pure speculation". Photo: AFP

Johnny Depp's legal team says that his ex-wife Amber Heard "has identified no legitimate basis to set aside" a Virginia jury's verdict in their bombshell defamation trial and asked the court to reject Heard's post-trial motions requesting a mistrial.

In a memorandum filed Monday (July 11) in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, lawyers for the Pirates Of The Caribbean star said that the verdict "should stand" and that Heard was making "frivolous" arguments and "outlandish requests" following the June 1 decision, which heavily favoured Depp.

"Here, the verdict was well supported by the overwhelming evidence, consistent with the law, and should not be set aside," Depp's team said in the document, adding, "While Ms. Heard slings an exceptional amount of mud at the wall in the hope that something might stick, the jury's verdict on damages was perfectly reasonable and supported by the evidence and testimony in this case."

It's the latest twist in the globally watched saga between the Hollywood exes, which has continued well past their six-week trial in the spring.

Monday's memorandum is Depp's latest response to Heard's attempts to reverse the verdict that awarded the Hollywood Vampires rocker US$10mil in compensatory damages and US$5mil in punitive damages after finding that she defamed him in a 2018 Washington Post op-ed. (That award was immediately reduced to US$10.35mil after the judge capped the punitive damages at US$350,000 per state law.)

Heard, whose description of herself as "a public figure representing domestic abuse" in the op-ed was at the heart of Depp's case, countersued and won one of three claims she brought against him in her US$100-million countersuit. (She was awarded US$2mil.)

Depp has denied Heard's allegations of physical and sexual abuse and said he never hit his ex, alleging that she was the abuser. He won three claims against his Rum Diary co-star.

Heard has already asked a judge to throw out the US$10.35mil verdict against her and has announced plans to appeal the verdict, calling it "excessive" and "indefensible".

Her attorneys argued that the verdict was not supported by the evidence and that one of the jurors in the trial was not supposed to be there.

Heard's attorney wrote and filed a five-page memo on Friday alleging that juror No. 15 was not the individual summoned in April for the six-week trial, thus asking the Fairfax Circuit Court to declare a mistrial in the case.

They cited "newly discovered facts" and suggested that the juror was a younger individual with the same last name who "apparently" lives at the same address as the person meant to be summoned, AP reported.

"As the Court no doubt agrees, it is deeply troubling for an individual not summoned for jury duty nonetheless to appear for jury duty and serve on a jury, especially in a case such as this," the filing said.

Actor Amber Heard and her attorneys Elaine Bredehoft and Benjamin Rottenborn looks over to the jury, just before the jury announced that they believe she defamed ex-husband Johnny Depp. Photo: AFPActor Amber Heard and her attorneys Elaine Bredehoft and Benjamin Rottenborn looks over to the jury, just before the jury announced that they believe she defamed ex-husband Johnny Depp. Photo: AFP

But Depp's team on Monday argued that her claim is "based on pure speculation," writing that Heard admitted "that she was aware of the purported discrepancy in Juror 15's birth year from the very start of trial because 'Juror 15 ... was clearly born later than 1945'."

They argued that the juror who ultimately served "was qualified to serve as a juror in Fairfax County and was vetted" and agreed to by both sets of attorneys during pretrial procedures.

Meanwhile, Heard's insurance company New York Marine and General Insurance Co. filed a lawsuit against the Aquaman actor Friday in federal court, seeking to avoid having to pay her after her unsuccessful defense in the lawsuit.

The insurance company said in the lawsuit that it doesn't believe it has an ongoing obligation to defend Heard. Another insurance company is also providing coverage to Heard. – Los Angeles Times/Tribune News Service

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Entertainment

Sex And The Gen Z: Young viewers show disdain for Carrie Bradshaw
Kanye West in talks to launch porn studio
Yusof Haslam is proud of 'Sheriff', which explores darker side of police force
Ruhainies apologises to Aliff Aziz's estranged wife Bella Astillah, hopes to meet her 'to clear the air'
Rapper Megan Thee Stallion 'forced employee to watch her having sex': lawsuit
‘Why haven’t you aged?’: Former child actor Hao Shao-wen, 34, to singer Jimmy Lin, 49
Bella Astillah heartbroken and disappointed husband Aliff conspired with another woman against her
Meta sued in Japan over celebrity investment scams
Taylor Swift fans descend on London pub name-checked on album
Former TV host Norjuma charged in four different courts with causing hurt, property damage

Others Also Read