Amber Heard asks for Johnny Depp verdict to be tossed, alleges juror lied about ID


By AGENCY

The 'Aquaman' actress has filed to have the verdict thrown out in ex-husband Johnny Depp’s defamation lawsuit against her. Photo: AFP

As expected, Amber Heard has filed to have the verdict thrown out in ex-husband Johnny Depp’s defamation lawsuit against her. But beyond the predicted claims, the Aquaman star has also accused the Virginia court of not properly vetting one of the jurors.

In a 44-page memorandum filed Friday (July 1) in Fairfax County, Virginia, Heard’s lawyers called for an investigation into possible “improper juror service,” alleging that there was a “discrepancy” about the age of one of the jurors who was born in 1970, not 1945 as reported by the court.

“Given the requirements for verification of each juror, it appears the identity of the juror was not verified,” reads the memo.

“It is unclear if Juror No. 15 was in fact ever summoned for jury duty or qualified to serve on the panel.”

Depp won all three defamation claims against Heard last month after suing her for US$50mil over a 2018 Washington Post op-ed in which she referred to herself as “a public figure representing domestic abuse”; Depp was not named in the article.

He was awarded US$15mil in damages, but Virginia law caps punitive damages and the amount was lowered to US$10.35mil.

Heard was also awarded US$2mil in damages because Depp’s lawyer called her allegations “a hoax.”

Amber Heard has new arguments in her case against Johnny Deep. Photo: AFPAmber Heard has new arguments in her case against Johnny Deep. Photo: AFP

But, Heard argued in Friday’s filing, Depp “proceeded solely on a defamation by implication theory, abandoning any claims that Ms. Heard’s statements were actually false.”

“Mr. Depp presented no evidence that Ms. Heard did not believe she was abused,” the filing reads. “Therefore, Mr. Depp did not meet the legal requirements for actual malice, and the verdict should be set aside.”

She also cited Depp’s libel case against The Sun in Britain, which he lost after the judge ruled that the article calling him a “wife beater” was “substantially true.” Because a court ruled that he was abusive, Heard argued, she cannot defame him by saying the same.

Depp’s legal team did not immediately return a request for comment on Monday. – New York Daily News/Tribune News Service

Article type: free
User access status:
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!
   

Next In Entertainment

South Korean superstar Rain set to perform in Kuala Lumpur on Aug 27
Former Le Sserafim member Kim Ga-ram breaks silence, denies bullying
'I Am Groot' review: Sweet, short Groot toons that are over too soon
'Lupin's Omar Sy to play Chow Yun-fat's role in remake of John Woo's The Killer
Anne Heche still in coma, not expected to survive, family says
How an almost naked Joo Won fought 100 men for a scene in action film 'Carter'
‘Insecure’ and ‘Beverly Hills, 90210’ star Denise Dowse in coma from meningitis
'Dancer In The Dark' director Lars von Trier diagnosed with Parkinson's disease
Andy Lau and Gordon Lam co-stars again after 10 years
Olivia Newton-John to receive state memorial service in Australia

Others Also Read