The latest attack on the Election Commission (EC) by DAP's Nga Kor Ming is both disappointing and revealing. Rather than demonstrating the judgement and responsibility expected of a member of the Cabinet, his remarks expose a troubling lack of appreciation for established government processes and the role of independent institutions.
After nearly eight years in government, one would expect a senior minister to understand the difference between political rhetoric and responsible governance. Unfortunately, Nga's comments suggest that he remains stuck in the habits of opposition politics, where criticism is prioritised over facts and political theatre takes precedence over constructive engagement.
Several important realities appear to have escaped his memory.
The EC has already provided a comprehensive explanation
The EC has clearly outlined the legal, administrative and logistical considerations behind its decision to hold the Johor and Negri Sembilan state elections separately. These are not arbitrary decisions but matters that involve constitutional responsibilities, electoral preparations and operational realities.
Instead of taking the time to understand the facts, Nga has chosen to publicly question the EC's judgement. This raises a legitimate question: Is he genuinely unaware of the reasons provided or is he deliberately disregarding them in pursuit of political headlines?
A minister should know the proper channels
As a member of the Federal government, Nga has direct access to the highest decision-making platforms in the country, including Cabinet discussions and official inter-agency channels. If he has concerns regarding the EC's decision, there are established avenues through which they can be raised and addressed.
Resorting to public assaults against an independent constitutional body serves little purpose other than creating unnecessary controversy. Such conduct reflects poorly on the maturity and discipline expected of a minister.
Still playing the Opposition role
DAP ceased being an Opposition party when it entered the Federal government in 2018. Yet Nga continues to behave as though he is campaigning from the sidelines rather than governing from within.
The responsibility of a minister is not merely to criticise but to formulate policy, build consensus and strengthen public institutions. Constantly seeking political confrontation may generate publicity but it does little to solve problems or inspire confidence in government.
The Malaysian public expects ministers to focus on delivering results, not engage in theatrical politics. The EC is carrying out its constitutional mandate in accordance with the law and established procedures. Disagreements can and should be addressed responsibly, without undermining public confidence in independent institutions.
If Nga remains unable to distinguish between the responsibilities of governance and the instincts of Opposition politics, he should reflect seriously on the role he is meant to play within the government.
The nation needs ministers who contribute to solutions, strengthen institutions and uphold collective responsibility. It does not need ministers who score political points by attacking the very system they are entrusted to serve.
NEOW CHOO SEONG
MCA Youth information chief
