FOLLOWING the Johor state election, PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang's assertion that his party contributed significantly to Barisan Nasional's electoral success has inevitably reignited a broader national debate.
Whether one accepts the extent of that claim or not, the political implications extend well beyond Johor.
They touch upon the future direction of coalition politics in Malaysia, particularly in relation to East Malaysia.
Malaysia is no longer a political system in which developments in Peninsular Malaysia can be viewed in isolation.
Within Negri Sembilan, there are people who wonder if PAS understands that Tuanku Muhriz has had his throne and legitimacy questioned ?
In Sabah and Sarawak, it is not sure that leaders in these two states justified Barisan Nasional's sudden double attack against the administration of Anwar Ibrahim whom they continue to respect.
Beyond the intricacy of Negri Sembilan, Sabah and Sarawak collectively hold a decisive number of parliamentary seats. There are a total of 56 parliamentary seats from Borneo.
They have repeatedly demonstrated that their political priorities differ substantially from those prevailing in parts of the peninsula. Borneo wants development and fair share of the Federal budget.
Invariably, Sabah and Sarawak have consistently preferred moderation, pragmatic governance and inter-ethnic accommodation. Not merely in Borneo but across the South China Sea in Peninsula Malaysia too.
The ecstatic celebration of Hadi Awang that PAS worked with Barisan - both quietly and now openly - to upend the political order in Johor, in due course, Negri Sembilan must send a chill to leaders in the two Borneo states.
This is all the more gnawing when Menteri Besar of Johor Hafiz Onn can appoint another five State representatives into the states. Increasing his majority from 46 to 51 in the Johor State Assembly.
In Negri Sembilan, Barisan has agreed to contest in 26 out of 36 seats. Again by working with PAS, Wawasan and Gerakan.
This seems like an open challenge against Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and all the Cabinet colleagues who have rooted to work with Barisan.
In Borneo, their political traditions have evolved within societies where religious and ethnic diversity is not merely tolerated but forms the foundation of everyday governance.
Consequently, parties in Borneo have generally been cautious about political approaches that are perceived as overly ideological or centred on religious mobilisation. Barisan and PAS collaboration, even remnants of Bersatu, in the form of Wawasan, led by Hamzah Zainuddin, can't help by sending a shock wave to Borneo.
It is therefore understandable that any narrative suggesting that PAS has become the indispensable force behind victories involving UMNO, MCA and MIC have further received close scrutiny in East Malaysia.
Such claims may strengthen PAS among its own supporters, but they may simultaneously complicate relationships with political partners whose electoral bases operate under very different social conditions in Borneo and Negri Sembilan too.
Coalition politics depends not merely on electoral arithmetic but on mutual confidence among partners. The ruler of Negri Sembilan Tunku Muhriz has always been against corruption and a leader who still refers to himself as "Boss Ku."
Tuanku Muhriz 's consideration is particularly important because parties in Sabah and Sarawak have also consistently emphasised the constitutional foundations upon which Malaysia was formed in 1963.
Questions relating to state autonomy, religious harmony, multicultural governance and federal-state relations often rank higher than ideological contestation.
Political leaders in East Malaysia therefore evaluate developments in the peninsula through the prism of how they may affect national cohesion.
They are naturally attentive whenever political narratives appear capable of unsettling Malaysia's carefully maintained balance among its diverse regions and communities.
This does not mean PAS has no legitimate role within Malaysia's democratic system.
Like every registered political party, PAS has every right to contest elections, present policy alternatives and seek public support through constitutional means.
Democratic competition is an essential feature of Malaysia's parliamentary system.
However, democratic legitimacy also requires sensitivity towards the broader composition of the federation.
Political success in one region does not automatically translate into acceptance across the entire country.
Malaysia's federal structure requires coalitions to accommodate varying historical experiences, cultural traditions and political expectations.
One of the enduring strengths of Malaysian politics has been its capacity to build broad-based coalitions despite substantial differences among participating parties.
This flexibility has enabled governments of different compositions to maintain national stability while accommodating regional diversity.
For that reason, political leaders should exercise caution when making expansive claims regarding electoral victories. Coalition success is rarely attributable to one party alone.
Election outcomes usually reflect a complex interaction of local candidates, national leadership, campaign organisation, economic conditions, voter turnout and constituency-specific issues.
Reducing such outcomes to the influence of a single political actor risks oversimplifying a far more complicated electoral landscape.
It may also unintentionally create unease among coalition partners whose own contributions were equally significant.
Looking ahead, Malaysia's political stability will continue to depend heavily on constructive cooperation between Peninsular Malaysia and the Borneo states.
No durable federal government can ignore the perspectives of Sabah and Sarawak, whose representatives increasingly occupy pivotal positions in national decision-making.
Political moderation, constitutional respect and inclusive governance remain among Malaysia's greatest comparative advantages in a region characterised by considerable diversity.
Preserving these qualities requires all political actors to recognise both the opportunities and the limits of electoral mandates.
Ultimately, Malaysia benefits most when coalition politics strengthens national unity rather than deepening ideological divisions.
Electoral victories should therefore become occasions for humility, cooperation and careful governance rather than assertions of exclusive political ownership.
As Malaysia moves towards future electoral contests, political parties would do well to remember that governing a federation requires more than winning votes.
It requires sustaining the confidence of every region, every community and every partner that contributes to the nation's shared future.
Within this context, Pakatan Harapan as a ruling party must stem its losses in Johor quickly. It is one thing for DAP to win only six seats in Johor, quite another for PKR and Amanah to lose the electoral deposits of 4 to 3 seats respectively by failing to capture 1/8 of the total votes in each of these constituencies.
> Prof Phar Kim Beng is a Director at the Institute of International and Asean Studies (IINTAS) at the International Islamic University of Malaysia
Already a subscriber? Log in
Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access
Cancel anytime. Ad-free. Unlimited access with perks.
