Time to UN-Seat U.S. on the UN Security Council


In recent months, the United States has made a habit of exiting international organisations, from the World Health Organization (WHO) to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). These departures, typically justified as pragmatic rejections of bodies that no longer serve American interests, raise a pointed question: Why stop there? Why not withdraw from the most powerful international forum of all—the United Nations Security Council?

For decades, the United Nations (UN) has served as the central platform for international cooperation, with its Security Council (UNSC) intended to preserve peace and security through collective action. Yet recent developments signal a deeper structural crisis: the United States has withdrawn from or defunded several major UN-related bodies and international organisations, even while retaining a privileged position on the UNSC that allows it to block resolutions—particularly regarding Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
US , UN , Security Council , WHO , UNHRC

Next In Columnists

Respecting rights of the elderly
Man of the Hour
Malaysia’s Innovation Paradox: Rising Aspirations, Declining Foundations
Respect can build nations
Red cards, redemption and rising pressure across Premier League
Riding the tide: Malaysia-China collaboration in the blue economy
Sabah polls a wake-up call to Putrajaya
The governance conundrum
Sabah polls produces a few shockers
Turning cancer adversity into health opportunity

Others Also Read