Time to UN-Seat U.S. on the UN Security Council


In recent months, the United States has made a habit of exiting international organisations, from the World Health Organization (WHO) to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). These departures, typically justified as pragmatic rejections of bodies that no longer serve American interests, raise a pointed question: Why stop there? Why not withdraw from the most powerful international forum of all—the United Nations Security Council?

For decades, the United Nations (UN) has served as the central platform for international cooperation, with its Security Council (UNSC) intended to preserve peace and security through collective action. Yet recent developments signal a deeper structural crisis: the United States has withdrawn from or defunded several major UN-related bodies and international organisations, even while retaining a privileged position on the UNSC that allows it to block resolutions—particularly regarding Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
US , UN , Security Council , WHO , UNHRC

Next In Columnists

The Erosion of Restraint in the Taiwan Strait
Challenge of the ‘kamikaze’ kancil
Villa are back, Liverpool are broken – the Premier League endgame is near!
Mob rule: When justice is upended
Has PMX stepped on a melting iceberg?
China’s Global Civilisation Initiative (GCI) in a realist world: Asean's pragmatic choice
Malaysian athletics crying out for change – are we brave enough to do it?�
ABC of hepatitis and implications on sexual health
Power without accountability corrupts nations
A craving for unworthy awards

Others Also Read