Time to UN-Seat U.S. on the UN Security Council


In recent months, the United States has made a habit of exiting international organisations, from the World Health Organization (WHO) to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). These departures, typically justified as pragmatic rejections of bodies that no longer serve American interests, raise a pointed question: Why stop there? Why not withdraw from the most powerful international forum of all—the United Nations Security Council?

For decades, the United Nations (UN) has served as the central platform for international cooperation, with its Security Council (UNSC) intended to preserve peace and security through collective action. Yet recent developments signal a deeper structural crisis: the United States has withdrawn from or defunded several major UN-related bodies and international organisations, even while retaining a privileged position on the UNSC that allows it to block resolutions—particularly regarding Israel’s actions in Gaza.

The Star Christmas Special Promo: Save 35% OFF Yearly. T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
US , UN , Security Council , WHO , UNHRC

Next In Columnists

Answers needed on Johor water
Goodbye to a topsy-turvy year�
So who killed the GEG?
War of words over Najib's house arrest issue
Critical need for CPR training
Top at Christmas, haunted by history as�Arsenal press on for title race
A fine show in Thailand, but we have to roar louder
Bridging civilisations, guarding identity: Malaysia’s role in China’s Global Civilisation Initiative
Enhancing intimacy with genital piercings
From Pakistan: A closer Look at the deepening China–Malaysia partnership

Others Also Read