Why visual litter gets a free pass


Anti-litter campaign proves enforcement works, but illegal advertising chokes city’s landmarks

PERHAPS the people putting up illegal banners across Kuala Lumpur deserve recognition.

Not for advertising. Not for marketing. But for consistency.

Rain or shine, festive season or otherwise, they somehow manage to find every available pole, railing, tree and lamppost in the city.

Sometimes I wonder whether they work harder than the people tasked with taking them down.

One day, a pole is clear. Next, it is advertising something.

This raises an obvious question: If we can catch people throwing rubbish, why can’t we catch the people turning Kuala Lumpur into one giant notice board?

Every day, new banners appear on lampposts, railings, traffic sign poles and even trees.

Some are hung so high up that you wonder how tall is the ladder the installers are equipped with, or if they have a special talent for scaling public infrastructure.

Along Jalan Kelang Lama, rows of palm trees meant to soften the urban landscape have become makeshift advertising columns.

In Brickfields, decorative, Palava-inspired arches and Indian-style lampposts celebrating the area’s cultural identity are frequently wrapped with banners promoting restaurant menus, festive offerings and birthday wishes.

Sometimes, you notice the banner blocking the landmark before you even see the landmark itself.

The problem is not that the rules do not exist; it is that they are not being enforced consistently.

Out of curiosity, I contacted a banner printing company.

Rusted wire tightly wound around a utility pole along Jalan Kelang Lama, Kuala Lumpur, shows how illegal advertising continues to scar the city’s streetscape. — Bavani M/The Star
Rusted wire tightly wound around a utility pole along Jalan Kelang Lama, Kuala Lumpur, shows how illegal advertising continues to scar the city’s streetscape. — Bavani M/The Star

The salesperson was friendly and eager to secure the job.

When asked about permits and approvals from Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL), the response was telling: “Put it up first. Deal with the consequences later.”

That level of confidence does not come from reading regulations. It comes from experience.

For years, residents have heard promises of tougher action against illegal banners.

There have been discussions about increasing fines, stepping up enforcement and taking action against repeat offenders.

Yet, the banners remain. Some locations are repeatedly targeted because offenders know the chances of getting caught are slim.

What makes this harder to understand is that we have already seen what happens when authorities decide to get serious.

Take littering, for example.

The Housing and Local Government Ministry did not simply issue warnings and hope for the best.

It introduced stricter enforcement, fines of up to RM2,000, and mandatory community service orders requiring offenders to clean public spaces.

Its minister, Nga Kor Ming, recently revealed that more than 4,000 litterbugs had been caught so far, and said in jest that Kuala Lumpur now had thousands of “free social workers.”

Humour aside, the campaign has delivered an important lesson: people change their behaviour when there are consequences.

In my own neighbourhood, illegal dumping has reduced noticeably, and not because people have suddenly become more civic-minded.

They know there is now a realistic chance of being caught, fined and ordered to perform community service.

The same principle can be applied to illegal banners.

After all, they do not appear by magic. Someone pays for them. Someone prints them. Someone instals them.

Every banner has a trail leading back to a business, organisation or individual.

If authorities can identify litterbugs, surely they can identify repeat banner offenders.

Enforcement, however, should not be the only solution.

Kuala Lumpur also needs clearly designated no-banner zones, particularly in areas with cultural, heritage and tourism value.

Places such as Jalan Raja, sections of Brickfields, and tourism hotspots like Bukit Bintang should be protected from visual clutter.

These are places people should remember for their character and heritage, not for the latest promotion hanging from every available pole.

Illegal banners are not merely an enforcement issue, but also visual litter.

Just like rubbish dumped by the roadside, they slowly diminish the appearance of the city.

The anti-litter campaign has shown that enforcement works when there is sufficient commitment behind it.

The next time you stop at a traffic light, look around.

Count the banners hanging from poles, railings and trees, then remember that more than 4,000 litterbugs have been caught.

Surely catching those responsible for these banners cannot be any harder.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Columnists

A World Cup with little fanfare
Many pathways to service
Don’t turn a blind eye to animal cruelty
Indo-Pacific region does not need another imported security crisis
Beating the odds for BTS tickets
Why the Rukun Negara matters
Champion scions give Penang durian its edge
48 teams, one trophy - what it really takes to win the World Cup
The AI dividend: Advancing shared prosperity in Malaysia and China
The constitutional cost of caning

Others Also Read