Court orders Papagomo to enter defence over false Facebook post


SEPANG: The Sessions Court here on Thursday (July 30) ordered blogger Wan Muhammad Azri Wan Deris, better known as Papagomo, to enter his defence on a charge of publishing a false social media post claiming that 11 PKR Members of Parliament had withdrawn their support for party president and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Judge Ahmad Fuad Othman made the ruling after finding that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against Wan Muhammad Azri at the close of its case.

In his judgment, the judge said the court was satisfied that the prosecution had proven all three elements of the charge based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented during the trial.

He also rejected the defence's argument that the prosecution had failed to establish a case simply because it called only two witnesses, stressing that the number of witnesses was not the determining factor in establishing a prima facie case.

The judge further said the false post alleging that 11 PKR MPs had withdrawn support for Anwar not only had the potential to disrupt public order, but could also undermine investors' confidence in the country's political and economic stability.

“Imagine the impact of such content. It not only causes public anxiety but, in this context, also affects investor confidence.

“The court therefore finds that the prosecution has successfully proven all three elements of the charge. Accordingly, the accused is ordered to enter his defence,” he said.

The court fixed Sept 1, 2 and 15 for the defence proceedings, while judgment is scheduled to be delivered on Oct 22.

Earlier, Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) deputy public prosecutor Faten Hadni Khairuddin argued that an offence under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 did not depend on whether the accused was the original creator of the content.

“The accused's act of uploading the false content to his own Facebook account, with the intention prohibited under the law, is sufficient to satisfy the elements of the offence under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998,” she said.

Lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, representing Wan Muhammad Azri, argued that there was no conclusive evidence that his client had created or initiated the false communication referred to in the charge.

“The witness's own testimony showed that the message had already gone viral on WhatsApp, meaning a key element of the charge had not been proven, and the accused should have been acquitted without being called to enter his defence,” he said.

Wan Muhammad Azri, 42, was charged with creating and initiating a false communication through the Facebook account ‘Muhammad Azri’ on May 28, 2025, containing false information alleging that 11 PKR MPs had withdrawn their support for Anwar, with the intent to annoy and harass others.

The former Umno Youth exco member was charged under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, which provides for a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment or a fine of RM500,000, or both, upon conviction, as well as a further fine of RM5,000 for each day the offence continues after conviction. – Bernama

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Jalan Magazine to be closed from Aug 7-10 for LRT Mutiara Line works
Cops seized RM1.85bil worth of drugs, precursor chemicals in first half of 2026, says NCID director
Govt urged to act on Tabung Haji RCI recommendations
Zayn Rayyan case: High Court to hear Ismanira's appeal on Aug 19
Penang Development Corp to take full control of BKIP2 development, says CM Chow
Parliament to hold special sitting on Aug 11 to debate TH RCI report, says Anwar
AI poised to reshape Malaysia's built environment, says Housing Minister
Woman fined RM12,000 over offensive social media post insulting Islam
Keep Malaysia clean, welcoming for tourists, urges Nga
Man charged with murdering p-hailing rider, gets DNAA on drink driving charge

Others Also Read