High Court dismisses Indira Gandhi's contempt application against IGP


IPOH: The High Court has dismissed the application by M. Indira Gandhi for leave to commence committal proceedings for contempt against the Inspector-General of Police (IGP).

Justice Datuk Norsharidah Awang said that the evidence before the court showed that investigations had in fact commenced following the receipt of information regarding the whereabouts of Indira Gandhi’s former husband, K. Pathmanathan and that the investigative process was still ongoing.

"Under these circumstances, the court is unable to conclude that the proposed contemnors had already failed or refused to comply with the court's directions when the very investigation directed by the court had yet to be completed," she said.

She added that the court was of the view that the application had been filed before sufficient time had elapsed for the authorities to investigate the newly surfaced information and take any action that might be warranted.

She added that the court finds that the evidence relied upon by the applicant, including the alleged utilisation of Sara 100 and Budi 95 by Patmanathan, is insufficient to establish a prima facie case warranting the grant of leave to commence committal proceedings against the proposed contemnors.

"The applicant has failed to disclose a prima facie case of contempt, and the application for leave to issue committal proceedings against the proposed contemnors is dismissed, with no order as to costs.

"Notwithstanding the dismissal of the present application, the proposed contemnors remain under a continuing obligation to take all reasonable and proactive measures to execute the outstanding warrant of committal and to continue reporting to the court in accordance with the existing orders of the court," she said.

This marks the second time Indira’s attempt to initiate contempt proceedings against the IGP has been rejected by the courts.

Her first application, filed on Oct 28, 2020, named the IGP, the police, the Home Ministry and the government as the first to fourth defendants. The High Court dismissed the application on Aug 2, 2022.

The second application was filed on Nov 17 last year and was heard on Feb 27 this year.

Indira’s latest bid centred on the police’s alleged failure to enforce the High Court orders issued on May 30, 2014, specifically to recover her daughter, Prasana Diksa and the arrest of her former husband.

Prasana turned 18 in April this year. She was 11 months old when she was separated from her mother in 2009.

 

 

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Malaysia nears 2030 renewable energy target ahead of schedule, says Fadillah
Traffic fines for serious offences should reflect offenders' income level, says social activist
Former Minister Rafidah Aziz warns public of scam video exploiting her image
New expanded insurance scheme for domestic workers, employers launched
Federal govt allocates over RM216mil to strengthen Johor’s public housing, facilities under 13MP, says minister
Dr Sam regrets Perikatan internal matters spilling into public, urges focus on Johor polls
Duties, taxes on nicotine vapes will be determined in line with court decision, says Anwar
Malaysia seeks resolution from Norway over NSM export licence revocation
District assistant engineer from Kerian faces 146 corruption charges
Diesel sales in Sabah, S'wak double expected levels in March, April, exposing leakages, says Amir Hamzah

Others Also Read