PETALING JAYA: With a few thousand cases of fatal road accidents taking place each year, legal experts weigh in on the need for a special court to hear road accident cases.
Senior lawyer Kitson Foong said the challenge with road accident cases is not the complexity but the sheer volume of cases.
He proposed that a dedicated fast-track mechanism, in the form of a tribunal or a specialised division with procedures built around the actual nature of road accident disputes, be set up.
ALSO READ: Fast-track road fatality cases, say groups
“Hundreds of thousands of accidents every year, each one potentially spawning a criminal charge and a civil claim. The courts were never built to absorb that without breaking. The problem is not that our judges cannot handle these cases. They can. The problem is too many cases fighting for too few hearing slots,” he said.
“When a breadwinner is killed on the road, the family does not have the luxury of waiting three to five months for a court date. Medical bills do not pause for cause lists. Children’s school fees, for example, do not take adjournments. A system that makes people wait that long is not just slow, it’s failing them,” he said.
ALSO READ: JPJ backs special court
“Secondly, it is about accountability. When cases drag on, the deterrent message to reckless drivers is diluted. Swift consequences matte.”
Chief Justice Datuk Seri Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh said in January that case registrations had risen 63.37% from 1,522,005 cases in 2021 to 2,486,567 cases in November 2025.
Civil case registrations rose from 303,335 cases to 483,933 cases in the same period, a 59.54% increase.
ALSO READ: ‘I cannot grieve for too long’
Citing this numbers, Foong said road accidents form a significant part of that burden.
“Handle them efficiently in their own lane and you benefit every other litigant in the system too.
“Every road accident file sitting in a queue is a family in limbo. This is not a luxury reform. It is a basic obligation,” he said.
ALSO READ: More roadblocks to spot drivers under the influence
These cases are usually heard at the Sessions and Magistrate’s Courts.
He said there are systems abroad that Malaysia can emulate such as India’s Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Singapore’s dedicated Traffic Court and the UK’s Official Injury Claim portal.
“We need not wait for new legislation.
ALSO READ: DUI voids motor insurance coverage, says PIAM
“The CJ has administrative powers to designate dedicated Sessions Court dockets for road accident cases. That could happen now, if the will is there,” he said.
Meanwhile, Malaysian Bar president Anand Raj, when contacted, said that the current laws are enough to cover road accident cases.
“The law presently is comprehensive and exhaustive enough to cover all civil claims and criminal proceedings in relation to road traffic accidents,” he said.
Former Bar Council chairman Salim Bashir Bhaskaran said the judicial system and the public at large might receive tremendous benefits from a specialised court in terms of expertise, increased efficiency and in assuring knowledgeable adjudicators.
However, he said it cannot be created solely as a knee jerk reaction whenever there is a strong outcry or a surge in crimes such as road accidents.
“We must acknowledge that with positive moves towards specialisations there are some adverse consequences to be considered. A specialist adjudicator risks developing some consistent views with one school of thought while generalist arbiters may not be so immersed and thus will be more likely to stay above the fray,” he said.
He said another con is specialised courts are usually located in state capitals and the geography could be a challenge.
Salim said the law must also be amended to include a holistic approach and sentencing that also includes treatments and rehabilitation of the offenders.
