Case continues: Shahrir (left) with his lawyer Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad (right) at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur. — Bernama
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here was told that former attorney general Tan Sri Tommy Thomas insisted that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) prosecute Tan Sri Shahrir Ab Samad even though the investigation papers (IP) on his case were incomplete.
MACC investigating officer Nurzahidah Yacop, 35, said she received instruction from the prosecution, with permission given by Thomas on Jan 15, 2020, to charge the former Felda chairman, although the IP on the case was still incomplete.
She said this yesterday when cross-examined by lawyer Datuk Syed Faisal Al-Edros Syed Abdullah Al-Edros, representing Shahrir, at the trial of the former Johor Baru MP who is facing a charge of failing to declare RM1mil received from former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN).
Earlier, to a question by Syed Faisal Al-Edros, Nurzahidah said she agreed with the lawyer that based on transactions in Shahrir’s bank account book, he used his personal money of over RM2.6mil for political activities before receiving the RM1mil from Najib, on Nov 28, 2013.However, the MACC assistant superintendent admitted that she never investigated the RM1mil that Shahrir received from Najib even though Shahrir insisted eight times during the investigation in 2019 that the money was to replace his pension.
According to Nurzahidah, she did inform her superiors about it, but she was not instructed to investigate the matter.
Syed Faisal Al-Edros: In your opinion as an MACC investigating officer, is it fair for my client that an investigation was not conducted on the matter, even though he (Shahrir) repeatedly said it was to replace his money.
Nurzahidah: It is not fair for Shahrir, but I never received the document (withdrawal of RM2.6mil). My investigation was after the date of receipt of the RM1mil.
Questioned by Syed Faisal Al-Edros whether she felt suspicious about the action of his superiors in not ordering her to investigate it, Nurzahidah said “yes”.
On Thursday, the witness told the court that the RM1mil received by Shahrir from Najib was to replace his pension money which was used for political activities in the Johor Baru parliamentary constituency.
Shahrir, 72, was charged on Jan 21, 2020, with money laundering by not stating his real income in the income tax return form for the assessment year 2013, on the RM1mil, believed to be from unlawful activities, which he received from Najib through an AmIslamic Bank Bhd cheque, dated Nov 27, 2013.
In doing so, he had violated Section 113(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act 1967, on the RM1mil, believed to be from unlawful activities, which he received from Najib.
He was charged with committing the offence at IRB, Duta Branch, Government Office Complex, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Halim here, on April 25, 2014.
The charge, under Section 4(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001, provides imprisonment up to five years or a fine of RM5mil, or both, if convicted.
The hearing before judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin continues on Jan 5. — Bernama
