Federal Court upholds ruling that Nurul Izzah, Saifuddin Nasution did not defame NFCorp, chairman


PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has held that Permatang Pauh MP Nurul Izzah Anwar and Kulim MP Datuk Saifuddin Nasution Ismail did not defame the National Feedlot Corporation Sdn Bhd (NFCorp) and its chairman.

In a unanimous decision, a three-man panel chaired by Federal Court judge Justice Mohd Zawawi Salleh dismissed the appeal of NFCorp and Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Salleh Ismail and ordered them to pay RM50,000 in costs to Nurul Izzah, and Saifuddin who was sued in his capacity as PKR secretary-general.

Other judges on the bench were Justices Hasnah Mohammed Hashim and Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal.

NFCorp and Salleh had sued Nurul Izzah for her statements made in a press conference at Parliament, during her time as the Lembah Pantai MP in 2012, relating to the company's planned purchase of eight units of condominiums at KL Eco City using RM71.4mil of government funds as leverage some nine years ago.

The statements were made based on the exposure by PKR's former director of strategy Mohd Rafizi Ramli of how public funds for the NFC project had been used as leverage to secure loans for the purchase of the properties.

Justice Harmindar, who read the ruling, said the court found that the impugned statement, when read in its entirety, was not defamatory of the appellants but instead it was aimed at Salleh's wife Tan Sri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, who is former Lembah Pantai MP.

"In our assessment, such person (a reader) will not pay any attention to the alleged defamatory matter complained of which was in effect one sentence in a very long press statement concerning the wife of the plaintiff.

"That one sentence was meant to be only a precursor or introduction to the main sting in that it was the revelation by Rafizi of the misuse of funds that led to the first defendant (Nurul Izzah) raising new questions about the conflict of interest of Shahrizat in the purchase of the condominiums.

"No action has since been filed by Shahrizat in respect of these allegations although a suit was filed against Rafizi for the statements which he had made," Justice Harmindar said here on Monday (March 1).

The court said the leave questions by the appellant were not required to be answered as they were irrelevant for the case before them and the courts below were entitled to come to their findings on the issue.

"The orders made by the courts below are hereby affirmed," he said.

NFCorp and Salleh were represented by lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, Nurul Izzah and Saifuddin were represented by lawyers Razlan Hadri Zulkifli and Datuk Joshua Kevin.

NFCorp and Salleh filed the defamation suit on Dec 24,2013, against Nurul Izzah and Saifuddin, claiming that Nurul Izzah had made a slanderous statement on Malaysiakini TV on March 7,2012.

On March 4,2016, the Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed their lawsuit after ruling that the statement, when read as a whole, was not defamatory to NFCorp and Salleh.

NFCorp and Salleh then lost their appeal at the Court of Appeal on July 10,2017.

On March 8,2018, NFCorp and Salleh obtained leave to proceed with their appeal to the Federal Court with two legal questions for the court’s determination.

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 46
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
   

Next In Nation

Long border closure with Singapore straining family ties, says group
Wee: KL Sentral to improve services to keep up with increasing capacity
Jeffrey: Kohoi’s appointment an honour for Sabah STAR
Remembering Prince Philip’s 1956 Penang visit
Fiery artwork on a burning issue
File the right form and be aware of exemptions, taxpayers told
Some facing higher taxes despite lower revenue
‘Saliva test method easier’
Still on upward trend, daily infections hit 2,551
Eatery owners worry over ingredients price hike

Stories You'll Enjoy


Vouchers