Sodomy II: Anwar’s defence questions existence of lubricant


PUTRAJAYA: The defence in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's appeal has questioned whether there was penetration in the alleged sodomy case, as Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony was inconsistent with regards to the existence of a commonly-used sexual lubricant.

Lawyer Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram, a former Federal Court judge, argued that according to the evidence from the complainant Mohd Saiful at the High Court, the act was vigorous and fast and he suffered pain in his anus and stomach. 

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Sanusi apologises to Anwar for making any inappropriate remarks
Don't make comparisons to previous govt, says Dr Wee on country's press freedom ranking
Two more cops nabbed over RM1.25mil extortion case
Number of Kota Tinggi flood victims up to 300
Issue warning, not RM250,000 fine for first-time 'no palm oil' label offences, urges Mydin boss
Anwar attends development meeting in Kedah
Pejuang to make its presence felt in Sabah polls, says Mukhriz
Perak govt mulls postponing upgrade of Teluk Intan's leaning tower to next year
Foreign media reports on fuel price hike not true, Cabinet yet to discuss, says Fahmi
More racial interaction needed to stamp out extremist views, says Umno VP

Others Also Read