Dario Vitale's debut Versace collection was one of the most buzzed about in the recent runway season. Photo: Versace
That’s all he got? Eight months?
On Thursday (Dec 4), Prada Group announced that Dario Vitale, the previously unknown designer who had dared to take the reins of Versace after Donatella Versace, was leaving the fashion house after a single collection.
The news detonated across the fashion-celebrity nexus, leaving behind a trail of shredded denim, chain mail and confusion.
His tenure was one of the shortest of the creative director era – and certainly the only one to be cut short after a debut that was one of the most buzzed about, debated and potentially influential of the recent runway season.
Not only had it knocked the socks off jaded fashion critics, but it resonated through social media and with that holy grail of heritage brands: Gen Z.
Indeed, less than three weeks before the announcement of Vitale’s departure, Olivia Dean, the 26-year-old British singer-songwriter nominated for a Grammy Award as "Best New Artiste", had worn four – four! – looks from his new collection as the musical guest on Saturday Night Live.
“It’s crazy,” Nicky Campbell, a fashion commentator who posts under the Instagram account Nickycbell and is known for his pithy and unvarnished red carpet recaps, said when he heard Vitale was leaving.
“This was the first time I really understood the brand. It felt progressive and desperately needed.”
Hanan Besovic (who uses the Instagram account @ideservecouture) posted, “I’m not happy, because I wanted to see more.”
Read more: Versace creative chief Dario Vitale exits less than nine months on job
Even Luca Solca, a luxury analyst at Bernstein who represents a very different perspective, was surprised.
“It’s a pity,” he said, adding that Vitale’s “first step was good".
"I don’t understand why this happens.”
That the news of Vitale’s departure came only two days after Prada Group announced the completion of its nearly US$1.4bil (approximately RM5.8bil) acquisition of Versace from Capri Holdings was clearly not a coincidence.
Vitale, after all, was hired by Capri management after Donatella had decided to cede her design duties and become Versace’s chief brand ambassador.
He was not Prada’s choice.
“We would like to sincerely thank Dario for his outstanding contribution to the development of the brand’s creative strategy during this transition period, and we wish him all the very best in his future endeavours,” went the Prada statement.
It had no attribution, though Lorenzo Bertelli, Prada’s director of marketing and sustainability and the son of Miuccia Prada and Patrizio Bertelli, is now also the executive chair of Versace.
Still, given that before joining Versace, Vitale had spent 15 years working under Miuccia at Miu Miu, most recently as its design director, and given that during that time he had been critical to transforming it into the explosive success story of the Instagram generation, it seemed a particularly anodyne goodbye.
Some had seen his presence at Versace as a potential attraction for Prada – he was a known talent, at least to them, but that was clearly not the case.
“He left the Prada Group, and then suddenly, he was part of the Prada Group again,” said Marigay McKee, a founder of venture capital firm Fernbrook Capital and a former president of Saks Fifth Avenue.
“That could be an awkward situation.”
Even before Vitale’s first collection was rolled out, there were rumours that he was not long for the job.
First, it was said that Vitale would not have an official show, and Versace was not listed on the Milan Fashion Week calendar. Then Vitale had a surprise show, but neither Miuccia nor Donatella attended.
The press team said that they didn’t want to “steal the limelight” from Vitale, but the conscious distancing was glaring – and it seemed like a backhanded message.
Then came the rapturous response to the show and its celebrity supporters.
Aside from Dean, they include Addison Rae, who is also nominated for a Grammy, Lorde and Aimee Lou Wood, the gaptoothed actress from Sex Education and The White Lotus, who appeared in Vitale’s first Versace eyewear campaign.
Rumour had it that Vitale may have bought himself some more time.
Even if Vitale’s clothes had not yet made it into stores and their literal impact was impossible to measure, their stylistic impact was another story.
“The show went very wide on social, because people were having such a strong reaction to it,” Campbell said. “It was like a seismic shift. You couldn’t avoid it.”
What Vitale did in his very short time at Versace was offer a new way to see the brand, which under Donatella had seemed increasingly frozen in amber, locked into a rinse-and-repeat cycle of old goddess gown references and medusa head prints.
She had taken over as creative director, a job she unexpectedly assumed after the killing of her brother Gianni, and had dedicated herself to keeping the company, and his vision, alive.
It was a task she managed in the face of great pain and skepticism with resounding success, as the sale price indicated.
But the house needed someone else to take it forward.
The fact that Donatella accepted a recent Council of Fashion Designers of America award for positive change, with Amber Valletta wearing yet another version of the famous green palm-print gown that Jennifer Lopez wore in 2000, illustrates the point.
By contrast, Vitale, 42, took inspiration from Gianni’s years in South Beach, Florida, and brought an accessibly hedonistic edge to his work, with crotch-hugging pants, studded leathers, a Miami Vice colour palette and beaded skirts that flashed a bit of bottom as they swished past.
Though the show shocked some of the old Versace customers, Vitale seemed a part of a new generation of designers that emerged last season, including Jonathan Anderson at Dior, Matthieu Blazy at Chanel and Michael Rider at Celine, who were less beholden to the past of the storied brands they had inherited and more focused on reshaping them for the future.
Read more: Did Versace’s pivot to ‘quiet luxury’ eventually lead to the Prada takeover?
“It brought a new set of eyeballs to Versace,” said Robert Burke, founder of a luxury consultancy.
Abruptly abandoning Vitale’s vision, he said, means that “now even the educated fashion consumer is confused”.
The optics of dumping a designer so quickly, before it is possible to assess his success at retail, sends a particularly disheartening and jumbled message to designers and to consumers.
There’s a reason Anderson said he had told Dior he needed at least “five collections” before his ideas would be fully realised.
History is littered with the stories of wildly successful designers who took a few years to get it right, including Pierpaolo Piccioli and Maria Grazia Chiuri at Valentino.
“Many designers already feel a lack of job security,” said Karen Harvey, a longtime fashion headhunter, referring to the more than 20 designers who were fired and hired over the past year.
“This will not help.”
For retailers, she said, “this will impact sales, as the continuity of vision will likely not be there for future collections, so they will certainly have pause” before investing in the brand.
According to the Prada announcement, a new creative director will be named “in due course”.
In the meantime, the creative team will be led by CEO Emmanuel Gintzburger.
“It’s such a missed opportunity,” Campbell said. Whether it also becomes one of fashion’s cautionary tales is the question. – ©2025 The New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
