'I failed miserably’: lawyer who used ChatGPT in brief explains fake cases to judge


The case is 'schadenfreude for any lawyer,' Minkoff said, 'because lawyers have historically had difficulties with new technology.' — AP

A New York lawyer told a judge he never meant to fool anybody when he filed a court brief full of phony legal precedents invented by ChatGPT.

Steven Schwartz, who faces punishment for the brief, on Thursday asked US District Judge P. Kevin Castel for leniency. The lawyer claims he had no idea the free artificial intelligence tool could create fake case citations and court opinions.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Tech News

Telegram's Durov says Russia triggered payment system problem by blocking VPNs
EU chat control deal�expires, halting mass child pornography scanning
Influencers accused of peddling medical misinformation on social apps
How will Meta and Google's landmark legal defeat change social media?
The anomaly of humanity as AI grows inevitable
Musk asks SpaceX IPO banks to buy Grok AI subscriptions, NYT reports
SpaceX delays next Starship test launch by a month, Musk says
Italian court rules Netflix price-hike clauses are void, orders refunds
Trump administration proposes expanding Chinese tech gear crackdown
Moscow shoppers and travellers hit by payment system problem

Others Also Read