Musk in ‘Twitter sitter’ appeal says recent verdict supports him


sk has battled with the SEC over his social media posts since the 2018 tweets, which prompted the regulator to sue, claiming Musk and Tesla had misled shareholders. — Photo by Britta Pedersen/POOL/AFP

Elon Musk told an appeals court that his victory in a San Francisco trial shows his 2018 deal with the US Securities and Exchange Commission requiring a Tesla Inc. lawyer to screen his company-related tweets should be thrown out.

Musk, Tesla’s chief executive officer and now the owner of Twitter Inc., has argued that the SEC is harassing him and that a consent decree he signed violates his free speech rights. He has specifically targeted the requirement for a screener, whom some have called his "Twitter sitter.”

Read More: Musk, SEC Settle Legal Fight Over His Tweets About Tesla

In the San Francisco trial, a federal jury took just two hours to clear Musk of civil claims by investors that he defrauded them when he tweeted in 2018 that he had "funding secured” to take Tesla private, sending shares of the electric car maker surging. Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, argued the verdict confirms Musk’s claim that his tweets didn’t violate securities laws.

"The jury’s verdict provides further reason why the public interest in avoiding unconstitutional settlements easily subsumes the SEC’s purported stake in the consent decree,” Spiro said in a letter to the federal appeals court in Manhattan on Tuesday.

The SEC declined to comment on the letter.

Musk has battled with the SEC over his social media posts since the 2018 tweets, which prompted the regulator to sue, claiming Musk and Tesla had misled shareholders. Both settled with the SEC, each paying $20 million and agreeing that Musk’s Tesla-related tweets would be reviewed before he posts them.

US District Judge Lewis Liman in April refused to let Musk out of the deal, saying he was "simply bemoaning that he felt like he had to agree to it at the time” and now "wishes that he had not.”

Arguments in the appeal could come as soon as late March.

The case is US Securities and Exchange Commission v. Musk, 22-1291, 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals (Manhattan). – Bloomberg

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Tech News

‘Silent Hill 2’ was clumsy, brutal and brilliant
'Kids are talking to each other.' Teachers, students in the US embrace phone ban
Opinion: Cell phones keep interrupting concerts. Some policies aren't helping
How private is deleted phone data? Expert explains after warrant suggests US judge tried to reset phone
Experts point to copycat behaviour, social media climate as reasons for rise in school threats in US area
FAA approves SpaceX Falcon 9 return to flight after mishap probe
Elon Musk's X drops Unilever from advertiser boycott lawsuit
Apple accused of restricting workers' Slack, social media use by US labor board
Hurricane Milton: Fact-checking conspiracies, rumors and AI images
Tesla's robotaxi event was long on Musk promises. Investors wanted more details

Others Also Read