Better practice for reviewing traffic impact reports


I READ with interest the report “Council appoints checker to assess TIA reports” (Metro News, The Star, March 8) regarding the requirement for Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) reports on Penang Island by private developers to be inspected by an independent checker (IC) starting this year.

As a professional in the transport and traffic field who promotes sustainable development (transport and mobility) in Sabah and beyond, I would like to suggest a good, if not best, practice for reviewing TIA submissions of proposed transport and traffic mitigation measures related to site development/re-development.

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Letters

Gilley's remarks disrespect Malaysia's stance on Israel-Palestine conflict, says MCA Youth leader
Should we blame it all on plastic?
Cultivating good mental health starts from young
Working on safeguarding cross-border data transfer
There are economic benefits from waste
Climate’s effects on work
Small initiatives can help solve manpower problems
Removing fuel subsidy a discriminatory act
Call for open court proceedings not misplaced
Awaiting Labour Day with high expectations

Others Also Read