Exceptions to double jeopardy protection


A MALAYSIAN citizen, who was convicted in Canada of sexually assaulting dozens of women in Toronto, served out his 24-year sentence and was then deported to Malaysia. Understandably, there were demands from many concerned Malaysians to act against him in order to prevent any repeat of the heinous crimes.

These calls draw our attention to the constitutional prohibition in Article 7(2) against “double jeopardy”. There is also the fact that the offender’s crimes were committed outside our country and outside the jurisdiction of our courts.

Subscribe now for a chance to win your dream holiday!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Shad Faruqi , columnist

   

Next In Columnists

Navigating the BRICS Storm: Separating Signal from Noise
Black swans in Penang’s politics
Festivals, culture unite Sarawak folk
A feast, ferries and a sad finish
The young ones inspire Malaysia’s golden dream
Royal rituals for democratic stability
Stopping cyberbullying menace starts with us
Plenty to sell at Aunty's garage sale, but not to make money
A new approach to VAR – making managers accountable in football
A plague of pigeons

Others Also Read