KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (Amendments) Bill 2024 has been deferred to gather more views and input from various stakeholders.
Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil stated that the delay aims to receive further insights from the Parliamentary Special Select Committee (PSSC) on Infrastructure, Transportation and Communication, as well as the PSSC on Human Rights, Election and Institutional Reform.
"We also want input from civil society organisations. I don't want any perception that the amendments will only favour one side. Everyone of us has issues either with telecommunications or the commission itself.
"The commission is owned by the people of Malaysia and I hope more will share their views," he said when winding up debates on the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (Amendments) Bill 2024.
Fahmi added that there were no restrictions if the PSSC intends to invite more parties to present their views. "We want to bring a Bill, which may not appease everyone, but is fair," he said.
RSN Rayer (PH-Jelutong) expressed gratitude for the government’s openness.
"When we present our views, the government and ministry are open to it, ensuring that freedom of speech is protected under the current administration," he said.
"PSSC on Human Rights, Election and Institutional Reform chairman William Leong said this would allow everyone to give their views. "We will invite the Bar Council and related groups as well," said the Selayang MP.
During debates on the proposed amendments, which began on Monday (Dec 9) and ended Tuesday, several MPs, including government backbenchers, urged for the Bill to be reviewed.
R. Yuneswaran (PH-Segamat) emphasised that the proposed amendments must consider more views from stakeholders.
"We don’t want the public to perceive this administration as being cruel. Referring it for further fine-tuning will prove the administration truly listens to voices from the ground," he said.
Lee Chean Chung (PH-Petaling Jaya) echoed this sentiment, stating that comprehensive engagements were needed to resolve any complexities.
"Previously, we would talk about building bridges and roads but today we need to talk about a proper framework to better develop our digital infrastructure.
"There is still room for improvement when it comes to the proposed amendments. Comprehensive engagements will also aid MPs in giving their input," he said.
