‘Charges clear and unambiguous’

Muhyiddin not misled, says court in allowing reinstatement of charges

PUTRAJAYA: The four abuse of power charges in connection with the Jana Wibawa project preferred against former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin (pic) are clear and not ambiguous, the Court of Appeal said in its grounds of judgment.

Justice Hadhariah Syed Ismail said the charges had listed all the necessary ingredients to establish an offence under Section 23(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009.

“In our opinion the particulars contained in each of the four charges were sufficient to give Muhyiddin notice of the matter with which he was charged,” she said in her 32-page grounds of judgment dated April 16, posted on the judiciary’s website.

She said Muhyiddin was not misled in any manner whatsoever merely due to the lack of particulars, and deemed it unnecessary for the prosecution to provide further particulars regarding the commission of the offence, Bernama reported.

On Feb 28, the three-member Court of Appeal bench led by Justice Hadhariah, alongside Justices Azmi Ariffin and SM Komathy Suppiah, allowed the prosecution’s appeal and reinstated the charges that had been previously struck out by the High Court.

Justice Hadhariah said the High Court judge had erred when he held that the charges were not clear and Muhyiddin was misled. She said all the four ingredients for an offence under Section 23(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act were stated in the charges.

She then added that Muhyiddin was charged in his capacity as prime minister and president of Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (PPBM), therefore, satisfying the first ingredient of the offence that he is a “public officer”.

The second element of the offence was also articulated in the charges, alleging that Muhyiddin had used his position, she noted.

As for the third and fourth ingredients of the offence, she said the charges preferred against Muhyiddin had included the word gratification and that the gratification was for his associate, namely PPBM.

Muhyiddin, then 76, and serving as prime minister and president of PPBM, faced charges of leveraging his position to solicit bribes totalling RM232.5mil from three companies – Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd, Nepturis Sdn Bhd and Mamfor Sdn Bhd – as well as from Datuk Azman Yusoff on behalf of the party.

He is accused of allegedly committing the offence at the Prime Minister’s Office, Bangunan Perdana Putra, Federal Government Administration Centre in Putrajaya between March 1, 2020 and Aug 20, 2021.

Muhyiddin also faces two charges of receiving illegal proceeds amounting to RM195mil from Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd, deposited into Bersatu’s CIMB bank account.

He allegedly committed the act at CIMB Menara KL branch, Jalan Stesen Sentral, between Feb 25 and July 16, 2021 and between Feb 8 and July 8, 2022.

Muhyiddin’s application to obtain leave to commence a judicial review of the Feb 28 Court of Appeal’s decision to reinstate the charges against him will be heard by a five-member panel of the Court of Appeal on July 9.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

China ready to work with Malaysia to build China-Malaysia community, says Li Qiang
Three-tier MM2H to be a permanent feature, says Tiong
China's Premier Li Qiang arrives in Malaysia for three-day official visit
Court of Appeal verdict shows SLS isn't a ‘busybody’, says lawyer
Victim dies a week after fight, Sabah cops reclassify case to murder
Police searching for drug case suspect who fled Beluran roadblock
Sacrificial buffalo escapes, breaks woman's leg in Menggatal
Nine arrested after foreigner found dead with stab wounds, head injury in Ipoh
Babagon villagers to get RM16.8mil concrete bridge in two years
Four to be charged with burglary of influencer Kieda Crepe's house

Others Also Read