M’sia urged to stay wary despite Spanish court ruling


KOTA KINABALU: Malaysia should remain on guard against attempts to enforce the tainted US$14.9bil Paris Arbitration Court award despite a Spanish court decision to convict arbitrator Gonzalo Stampa earlier this week, says Sabah lawyer Datuk Roger Chin.

He said the possibility of the enforceability of the award had remained until the French Court made a final decision to set aside Stampa’s final order for Malaysia to pay the self-proclaimed heirs of the defunct Sulu sultanate.

“The impact of Stampa’s conviction on enforcing the French Arbitration Award is uncertain and depends heavily on the specific legal context and interpretation of the New York Convention in each potential enforcement country.

“While it could bolster Malaysia’s arguments and increase scrutiny of the award, it’s not a guaranteed path to blocking the enforcement,” Chin said when contacted.

On May 25, 2020, Stampa issued a purported final award of US$14.9bil to eight self-proclaimed heirs of the defunct Sulu sultanate.

Malaysia filed a complaint against Stampa with the Public Prosecutor of Spain in December 2021, stating that he had acted in contempt of court.

Then on Monday, Stampa was found guilty of contempt of court and sentenced to six months’ jail by the Spanish Court.

Referring to the conviction, Chin said that Stampa was likely to appeal against it.

“This could prolong the legal saga,” he said.

However, he noted that the French court’s stay order on the award remained in place.

Urging Malaysia to be on the guard by attempts to enforce the award in some countries, Chin said the grounds for the New York Convention were limited and Stampa’s conviction might not be good enough.

Chin, who is a former Sabah Law Society president, cautioned that some countries might focus on the content of the award itself and decide it was valid irrespective of Stampa’s actions.

“While the conviction could raise doubts, the core issues like the 1878 Sulu agreement with the Sulu kingdom might still be considered,” he said.

However, he said Stampa’s conviction had strengthened Malaysia’s position.

“Stampa’s conviction for contempt and invalid judicial appointment could bolster Malaysia’s argument that the arbitration award was flawed and should be set aside in the Paris Court of Appeal,” added Chin.

He said Stampa’s conviction could be seen as a victory for Malaysia in its fight against the Sulu claims.

He was also confident that the controversy surrounding Stampa and the award would draw more attention to the case, leading to courts in other countries to scrutinise it more closely before enforcing it.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Sulu , stampa , Malaysia , New York Convention

   

Next In Nation

Mat rempit sent fleeing – on foot – as KK cops storm illegal racetrack
PM speaks to Melbourne students, shares insights on positive change
Former mosque treasurer claims trial to misappropriating money
Penang JPJ issues 162 summonses in three-hour operation
Bangladeshi men killed after being hit by train near Kajang
MTUC appreciates EPF's efforts to ensure yearly dividend increase
Palestine humanitarian crisis, scammers among focus of Dewan Rakyat today
Secondary School Alternative Certificate out on March 11
Mohd Na'im hopes Syariah lawyers can strengthen unity
International Women's Day: The tech industry needs to do more to be inclusive, say experts

Others Also Read