Parties in Rosmah's appeal told to file submissions on jurisdiction issue

PUTRAJAYA: The prosecution and defence need to file further submissions on whether or not the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear two appeals by Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor (pic) to remove High Court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan from presiding over her money laundering and tax evasion case.

Rosmah, the wife of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, had appealed against two decisions by Justice Mohamed Zaini who dismissed her first application on Dec 14 last year and her second on April 25 this year.

A three-member bench led by Datuk Hanipah Farikullah said the panel had read the written submissions filed by both parties and was of the view that there is a preliminary point on the jurisdiction issue that should be heard first.

ALSO READ: Rosmah's appeals to recuse judge in money laundering trial to be heard Nov 22

"It is in relation to whether the matter before us is appealable under Section 3 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (COJA) read together with Section 51.

"The court gives both parties a month to file their further written submissions on that point," said Justice Hanipah, who sat with Justices Datuk Wira Ahmad Nasfy Yasin and Datuk Nordin Hassan here on Tuesday (Nov 22).

Section 3 of COJA states that the term "decision" means a judgment, sentence or order made by the High Court, but does not include any ruling made in the course of a trial or hearing of any cause or matter which does not finally dispose of the rights of the parties.

Meanwhile, deputy public prosecutor Poh Yih Tinn told reporters that the appeals will be fixed for case management on Dec 23, pending the filing of further submissions.

Lawyers Datuk Geethan Ram Vincent and Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin, representing Rosmah, were also present in court.

In her recusal application, Rosmah, among others, stated that the reason is to avoid any possibility of Justice Mohamed Zaini being prejudiced and biased against her if he presided over the money laundering case, given that he had presided over her solar hybrid graft trial, related to rural schools in Sarawak.

ALSO READ: Solar project case: Dec 19 case management for Rosmah's appeal

Rosmah, 70, is facing 12 money laundering charges, involving RM7,097,750, and five counts of failure to declare her income to the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN).

The offences were allegedly committed at Affin Bank Berhad, Bangunan Getah Asli branch, Jalan Ampang, here, between Dec 4, 2013 and June 8, 2017, and the LHDN office at Kompleks Bangunan Kerajaan, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Halim, here, between May 1, 2014 and May 1, 2018.

Meanwhile, the money laundering and tax evasion case is set for case management on Nov 29, before Justice Mohamed Zaini.

On Sept 1, he found Rosmah guilty of three charges of corruption related to the solar hybrid project worth RM1.25bilfor 369 rural schools in Sarawak and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and imposed a fine of RM970mil.

The court also ordered Rosmah to be jailed for 30 years if she fails to pay the fine. However, the High Court granted a stay of execution of the prison sentence and fine pending her appeal at the Court of Appeal. – Bernama

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

No US evidence on Iranian oil movement through Malaysian service providers, says Anwar
Construction of West Ipoh Span Expressway expected to start in June, says Perak MB
Halt weapons transfer from the US to Israel, says Anwar in Al Jazeera interview
RM1.5bil allocated for Sarawak rural development under 12MP
Man tries to seize submachine gun from cop at police station in Penang
All parties urged not to take extreme actions in Palestinian solidarity campaigns
Upgrading of Federal Road FT3210 in Hulu Langat to benefit 52,000 users, says Nanta
Maintenance issues at Serdang Heart Centre's operating theatres to be fixed this year, says Selangor health director
Anwar calls for stronger ties among developing nations
Bee population declining in peninsula due to pesticides, says consumer group

Others Also Read