Judge recuses himself from hearing Anwar’s appeal

PUTRAJAYA: A Court of Appeal judge has recused himself from hearing an appeal brought by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim over his civil suit to invalidate his conviction for sodomy.

Justice Datuk Seri Kamaludin Md Said said he decided to recuse himself from hearing the case, which involved the sodomisation of Anwar’s former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, as he handled several other cases involving Anwar when he was with the Attorney General’s Chambers.

Anwar’s lawyer Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram brought to the attention of the Court of Appeal’s three-member panel that Justice Kamaludin had previously disqualified himself from hearing the matter in the High Court.

Justice Kamaludin said he was supposed to hear the case in the High Court before the case was transferred to another court.

He said he had also handled several other cases involving Anwar when he was senior federal counsel.

Anwar’s appeal against the Nov 8,2017, High Court decision to allow the government’s application to strike out his lawsuit was scheduled to be heard yesterday before the panel comprising Justices Kamaludin, Datuk Has Zanah Mehat and Datuk Wira Ahmad Nasfy Yasin through the Zoom video-conferencing platform.

Senior federal counsel Suzana Atan appeared for the government and lawyer Harvinderjit Singh, representing lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah who was allowed to intervene in this appeal, said they were leaving it to the court.

Justice Kamaludin then instructed the appeal to be sent for case management yesterday to set a new appeal hearing date before another panel.

When contacted, Anwar’s other lawyer J. Leela said Court of Appeal deputy registrar Nik Serene Nik Hashim fixed June 29 for the next appeal hearing.

Anwar, who is Port Dickson MP, filed the originating summons on June 9,2017, naming the government as the defendant.

He claimed that he did not get a fair trial in the appeal against his sodomy conviction.

He also sought a declaration that his conviction by the Court of Appeal on March 7,2014, was ultra vires the Federal Constitution and was thus null and void.

He also wanted an order that the decision by the Federal Court in upholding the Court of Appeal’s decision was also null and void.

In his affidavit, Anwar alleged that Muhammad Shafee received RM9.5mil from former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak to lead the prosecution team in the appeal over his sodomy conviction.

Anwar’s conviction and five years’ jail term for sodomising Mohd Saiful were upheld by the Federal Court.

He was, however, given a full pardon by the King on May 16,2018. — Bernama

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 46
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

court , Anwar Ibrahim , civil suit , invalidate , sodomy


Next In Nation

Adham: Education clusters spike due to more mobilisations during the holidays
Group: School closure should be last resort
Students’ safety a concern as Covid-19 forces Johor schools to close
PM: Minerals can be top GDP earner by 2030
Saifuddin: Govt committed to upholding press freedom
PMO: Govt agrees to extend land lease for Convent Bukit Nanas
Wee congratulates TMJ on birth of his fourth child
Fire engulfs two units at Bukit OUG Condominium
Reezal Merican: Pak Lah is doing well, just like before
Convent Bukit Nanas administration thanks govt, Malaysians for lease extension

Stories You'll Enjoy