‘bin Abdullah’ case: Federal Court says illegitimate Muslim child cannot bear father's name


PUTRAJAYA (Bernama): The Federal Court in a majority 4-3 decision has ruled that a Muslim child conceived out of wedlock cannot bear his father's name.

The seven-member bench led by Court of Appeal President Datuk Rohana Yusuf allowed partly the appeal brought by the National Registration Department (NRD), its director-general, and the government to set aside the appellate court's decision.

The Court of Appeal, in 2017, held that a Muslim illegitimate child could bear his father’s name instead of using “bin Abdullah”.

Justice Rohana who delivered the majority Federal Court decision on Thursday (Feb 13) said Section 13A of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1957 (BDRA) does not apply to the registration of births of Malay Muslim children as Malays do not carry any surnames.

She said the Section 13A has no application to the Malay naming system and did not enable the children to be named with the personal name of a person

acknowledged to be the father of the children.

Justice Rohana, however, issued a consequential order for the NRD director-general to remove “bin Abdullah” from the birth certificate of the child in the case.

“The name of the first respondent (the child) without ‘bin Abdullah’ shall so remain, ” she said.

Justice Rohana held that the NRD director-general could not impose the fatwa (religious edict) of the National Fatwa Committee on the child since there was no fatwa on how to name an illegitimate child gazetted in Johor.

The majority decision were from Justice Rohana, Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Azahar Mohamed and Federal Court judges Datuk Mohd Zawawi Salleh and Tan Sri Idrus Harun.

The minority judgments were from Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri David Wong Dak Wah and Federal Court judges Datuk Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan that upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision.

The child was born less than six months after the parents' marriage, which is seen as being illegitimate under Syariah law.

The child's parents (whose identities have been withheld by the court) applied to the NRD under Section 13 of the BDRA to have the father's name on their child's birth certificate but the NRD refused to replace it with the father's name on grounds that the child was illegitimate despite the application being made.

The parents then filed a judicial review application at the High Court but it was dismissed on Aug 4,2016.

On May 25,2017, the Court of Appeal allowed their judicial review to compel the NRD director-general to replace the child’s surname “Abdullah” with the name of the child’s father in the birth certificate. – Bernama

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 18
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
   

Did you find this article insightful?

Yes
No

Next In Nation

JB cops nab Iraqi national suspected of beating man with iron rod
Father sets up daughter's 'classroom' in tent at top of hill
Covid-19: Sandakan opens new 500-bed quarantine, low-risk treatment centre at detention facility
‘Banana man’ issued summonses for driving with tree lodged in car in Skudai
Two foreign workers seriously hurt after concrete wall collapses on them
Border shootout: Sjn Norihan Tari transferred out of ICU
Flood situation improving in several states, Sg Golok still above danger level
Covid-19: Four new clusters detected in KL, Sabah, Selangor and Kelantan
Pejuang info chief comes to Dr M's defence, says had no part in wanting to set up Perikatan Nasional
Covid-19: 1,309 new cases reported, three fatalities bring death toll to 357 (updated)

Stories You'll Enjoy