Prepping for war on ice and snow


Finnish conscripts undergo training in Sodankyla. — Jim Huylebroek/The New York Times

THE Finnish Defence Forces sent out an urgent message: we are being invaded. We need help.

Hundreds of US troops – part of a new Arctic division – boarded planes in Fairbanks, Alaska. Their flight curved over the North Pole and landed at Rovaniemi Airport in northern Finland.

The soldiers quickly unpacked their M-4 assault rifles, rocket tubes and belt-fed machine guns and deployed to the quiet snowbound forests, dressed in Arctic whites and vapourproof boots.

This was all just a drill, launched in mid-February.

But the scenario is believed to be increasingly possible.

As climate change melts ice across the Arctic, that part of the world that was once so remote and forgotten is becoming more accessible and more contested.

The world’s major militaries – US, Russian, Chinese and European – are all training for a winter war.

“It’s really only been the past five or six years that everybody’s moved on from the global war on terror,” said Robert McBride, a Canadian brigadier-general helping oversee the war game.

“Arctic nations are starting to understand the strategic importance,” he said.

“The Arctic now has come to preeminence.”

The recent drill played out at a strange time in global affairs.

US President Donald Trump has been leaning away from Nato and getting friendly with Russia, and European leaders are seriously discussing how to create their own defence industry should America abandon them, something unthinkable just a few months ago.

But on this frozen ground, at least, US military cooperation and the perception of Russia as a widening threat appeared unchanged.

In Finland, which fought the Soviet Union during World War II, Russia remains the once and future enemy.

“There’s an old Finnish saying,” explained Janne Kuusela, a Finnish defence official.

“Russia will take what’s not nailed to the wall.”

America’s relationship with Finland, one of Nato’s newest members, seems solid.

Trump recently played golf with its president, Alexander Stubb.

Afterward he praised Stubb’s golf skills and said, “I look forward to strengthening the partnership.”

The two sides worked well together during the battle in the snow.

The Finns were nimble attackers, zigzagging through the woods on long, narrow skis.

The Americans set up machine guns on small round hilltops and dug foxholes in the snow.

Both sides said Arctic warfare was different.

“It’s kind of like operating in space,” said Christopher Brawley, a US colonel.

“No one’s coming to help you,” he said. “And the environment will kill you.”

The cardinal rule is staying dry.

Jackson Crites Videman, a Finnish soldier, recounted a gruelling test that Finnish soldiers must pass.

With all their gear on, including skis, they plunge through an ice hole cut into a river and have to scamper out – without freezing or drowning.

The day he did it was -36°C. He had about two minutes to strip off drenched clothes and change into new ones before frostbite set in.

And his hands stopped working.

“Your friends have to help you with the zippers,” he explained.

Crites Videman, who is half-Finnish, half-American, was drafted into the Finnish military a few months ago.

Finland is one of the few Western democracies with mandatory conscription.

It’s a country with a small population of 5.6 million, shares Nato’s longest border with Russia – 1,336km – and it recently raised military spending.

Finnish defence experts say tens of thousands of Russian troops used to be based near that border but have been decimated in the Ukraine war.

They believe it will take five to 10 years before they become a threat again.

Before the Ukraine war, the Finns say, Russia was investing in its Arctic forces, modifying tanks to operate better in the cold and designing new troop transporters.

The United States has been doing the same.

In 2022, it designated the 11th Airborne Division, based in Alaska, as its first and only Arctic division.

The division is experimenting with new uniforms and different combat skis.

During the exercise, the Americans showed off a new tracked vehicle that chewed its way up icy slopes, some quite steep.

The soldiers lived off special cold weather rations, higher in calories, because of all the energy drained from trying to stay warm.

Warfare during the Arctic summer isn’t much easier.

First, there is the issue of the sun. It never sets. So the advantage that night-­vision equipment gives Western militaries is eliminated.

When the ice melts, the land turns incredibly mushy.

Upper Finland, for example, is covered in thick forests, small mountains, marshes, rivers, lakes and bogs, making it very difficult to navigate. In many ways, it’s easier to move in winter.

During the war game, the attackers exploited the frozen rivers like highways. Soldiers dashed across them, guns strapped to their backs.

The commanders seemed pleased with the exercise and especially happy not to talk about politics.

When asked if he were worried about Trump’s friendliness with Russia, Sami-Antti Takamaa, a Finnish general, said, “It doesn’t worry me at all.”

“The US airborne division just came from Alaska,” he said.

“That’s what matters to me,” he added. — 2025 The New York Times Company

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.


Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Focus

Peace unravels as US pulls plug
Land of the melting ground
Bangladesh faces textile tsunami
Pay to dine with Trump
Ghosts beneath the gables
Panama’s river of ruin
Rebuilding Aleppo brick by brick
The sunny side of renting chickens
Another gulf name game?
Saving seeds amid the smoke

Others Also Read