What is this continued carnage in Gaza achieving?


The US bears special responsibility for the tragedy unfolding in Gaza, because it is American arms and bombs that are destroying neighbourhoods and killing people. — AP

ISRAEL’S prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has now returned to war in full force in the Gaza Strip. Massive Israeli airstrikes across Gaza have claimed more than 600 lives, including those of children, according to Gaza’s health authorities, and it seems clearer than ever that Netanyahu doesn’t have a plausible day-after plan for Gaza.

The ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was already on life support, and I’m afraid we’re now tumbling back into the savagery of a particularly brutal war that has left Gaza with the highest population of child amputees per capita in the world.

Negotiations on continuing the ceasefire were stalled, and Israel’s foreign minister, Gideon Saar, said that his country had “no alternative but to give the order to reopen fire.”

But of course, Israel had alternatives.

The main advocacy group for family members of Israeli hostages in Gaza had noted more than a few, albeit alternatives that were not particularly palatable to Israel’s leaders.

The hostage families group also denounced the airstrikes, saying: “We are shocked, outraged and deeply concerned by the deliberate destruction of the process to bring back our loved ones.”

Ever since the Oct 7 Hamas attack on Israel in 2023, Netanyahu has brilliantly advanced his own interests while proceeding without any obvious strategy that would advantage Israel. 

At this point, Israel has levelled much of Gaza, killing more than 50,000 Palestinians, including 13,000 children, according to Gaza’s health ministry. Some think those numbers are inflated, others an undercount: Medical journal The Lancet estimated 64,000 dead.

What has all this carnage achieved? Hamas’ fighting capacity is badly degraded, the planners of the Oct 7 attacks have been killed, and Israel has re-established a measure of deterrence: One senior Hamas official said recently that he would have opposed the attack if he had known of the conse­quences for the territory. 

On the other hand, neither of Israel’s two fundamental aims of the war – freeing all its hostages and destroying Hamas – has been achieved.

The United States has assessed that Hamas has recruited almost as many fighters as it has lost, and the group remains in control of Gaza and appears more popular in the West Bank and around the world.

Meanwhile, much of global opinion that was sympathetic to Israel in 2023 has turned decisively against it, and fairly or not, the word “genocide” is often associated with it. And the lives of the remaining Israeli hostages are again in peril.

The US bears special responsi­bility for the tragedy unfolding in Gaza, because it is American 2,000-pound bombs that have destroyed entire neighbourhoods; such monstrous munitions cannot distinguish between militants and infants. 

Former US president Joe Biden refused to use his leverage to press for an end to the war during his term, and President Donald Trump has already shipped another 1,800 of the 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and blithely proposed clearing Gaza of Palestinians in what would amount to ethnic cleansing.

With Netanyahu concerned only with his own career, with the US adding fuel to the fire, with neither Washington nor Jerusalem showing much concern for what civilians are enduring in Gaza, I’m afraid we should brace ourselves for continued bloodshed and suffering that serves no strategic purpose. – ©2025 The New York Times Company

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Israel , Gaza , genocidal , end of ceasefire

Next In Focus

US tariffs open a door for India
Childhoods haunted by decade of war
Sky saviours worth billions
Burning to save the prairie
Trump’s digital purge
From lawyer to guerilla fighter
The fall of a S. Korean strongman
Fruits of unity on reclaimed land
Women went to space, but men still want to own it
Satire and selfies in South Korea’s presidential elections

Others Also Read