Utah law restricting youth social media use blocked by judge


Facebook, TikTok, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram apps are seen on a smartphone in this illustration taken, July 13, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

(Reuters) - A federal judge has blocked Utah from enforcing a new law aimed at protecting the mental health of young people by requiring social media platforms to verify users' ages and impose restrictions on minors' accounts.

Chief U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby on Tuesday issued a preliminary injunction after concluding that tech industry trade group NetChoice was likely to succeed in establishing that the law violated the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment by unduly abridging the social media companies' free speech rights.

The decision marked the latest in a string of court rulings blocking laws deigned to protect young people online that states enacted to address rising concerns about the dangers posed by social media to the mental health of children.

"The court recognizes the state's earnest desire to protect young people from the novel challenges associated with social media use," Shelby wrote.

But he said, "even well-intentioned legislation that regulates speech based on content must satisfy a tremendously high level of constitutional scrutiny," and that Utah's law did not.

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes, a Republican, said his office was analyzing the ruling to determine what next steps should be taken.

"We remain committed to protecting Utah’s youth from social media's harmful effects," he said in a statement.

Republican Governor Spencer Cox signed the Utah Minor Protection in Social Media Act into law in March. The measure partially replaced an earlier social media regulation law the state repealed after NetChoice sued to block it as well.

The new law was set to take effect on Oct. 1 and required social media companies to adopt age verification systems to determine if a user was a minor and required the companies to impose special privacy settings for accounts used by children.

NetChoice, whose members include Meta Platforms' Facebook and Instagram, Alphabet's YouTube, Snap Inc's Snapchat and Elon Musk's X, argued that the law imposed unjustified, content-based restrictions on the companies' speech.

Shelby said the group's argument was "persuasive," saying the law drew distinctions between types of websites yet only imposed content-based restrictions on how social media companies can construct and operate their platforms and not others.

Chris Marchese, director of NetChoice's litigation center, in a statement said the ruling "highlights just how flawed this law is at its core," and that his group was looking forward to having it and similar laws nationally permanently struck down.

NetChoice has won court rulings blocking similar laws in full or part in Arkansas, California, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas.

(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Mark Porter)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

   

Next In Tech News

Philippines arrests alleged Chinese scam farm chain boss
Exclusive-Northvolt in talks for about 200 million euros in funding - sources
Here’s what you need to do before and after your phone is stolen or lost
Exclusive-Bain sought $10 billion valuation for Japan's Kioxia, investors only wanted to pay half
While others fled, these TikTokers posted through Hurricane Milton
Google faces painful reckoning as antitrust cases rev up
TomTom sees location tech sales at low end of guidance as weak auto demand weighs
Elon Musk unveils Tesla’s ‘Cybercab’, plans to bring autonomous driving tech to other models in 2025
Study: Adult TikTok users in the US want entertainment, not news and politics
A very stiff breeze: BBC says sorry for 20,000 kph wind forecast

Others Also Read