Elon Musk's X escapes most of lawsuit over copyrighted songs


FILE PHOTO: Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla and owner of X, formerly known as Twitter, attends the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at the Porte de Versailles exhibition centre in Paris, France, June 16, 2023. REUTERS/Gonzalo Fuentes/File Photo

(Reuters) - X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk, on Tuesday won the dismissal of most of a lawsuit by 17 music publishers that accused it of infringing copyrights on nearly 1,700 songs by letting people post music online without permission.

U.S. District Judge Aleta Trauger in Nashville, Tennessee said the publishers could not pursue a theory of "comprehensive general liability for infringement" against X, which Musk bought for $44 billion in Oct. 2022.

She dismissed two infringement claims, and dismissed a third claim for "contributory" infringement except for accusations that X did not properly police "verified" users and serial infringers, and failed to act on takedown notices fast enough.

Lawyers for the publishers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Alex Spiro, a lawyer for X, declined to comment.

Sony Music, Universal Music and other members of the National Music Publishers' Association trade group had sued X last June, seeking more than $250 million of damages.

They accused X of routinely ignoring and encouraging copyright infringement, giving it a leg up on platforms such as Meta Platforms' Facebook, Google's YouTube and ByteDance's TikTok that properly license music.

The publishers also said the problem had gotten worse since Musk bought Twitter.

But in a 21-page decision, Trauger said X was not liable for direct infringement, reflecting the distinction in federal copyright law between active participants in infringement, and parties such as X that merely provide a platform for it.

She also said X was not liable for "vicarious" infringement, saying it was not responsible to police how posts were drafted or obtain copyright permission in advance.

"X Corp undoubtedly had some power over X/Twitter's users -the way that a company that provides a valued service always has power over the customers who rely on it - but that does not turn customers into even loose equivalents of agents or subordinates," Trauger wrote.

Music publishers represent copyrights for songwriters, not for songs themselves.

The case is Concord Music Group Inc et al v X Corp, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee, No. 23-00606.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Stephen Coates)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

   

Next In Tech News

Exclusive-Apax, Bain and CVC exploring potential bids for SoftwareOne, sources say
Britain's new government aims to regulate most powerful AI models
US online sales hit $7.2 billion on first day of Amazon Prime Day event, Adobe says
Netflix's efforts to grow ad tier in focus as subscriber growth slows
Apple backs $50 million fund to support Bay Area affordable housing
US to award Taiwan's GlobalWafers up to $400 million to boost US semiconductor wafer production
Tokyo airport trials driverless cargo vehicle
China’s ‘rising star’ in chip design software cuts up to half its workforce amid market headwinds
Google-backed AI startup Cropin wants to predict future of food
ByteDance must keep gatekeeper label, EU court says in boost for regulators

Others Also Read