UK waters down online restrictions after free speech outcry


Critics expressed concern that a requirement for the biggest platforms to remove 'legal but harmful' content could lead to censorship and undermine free speech. The Conservative government of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has now dropped that part of the bill, acknowledging that it could 'over-criminalise' online content.— Reuters

LONDON: The British government on Monday abandoned a plan to force tech firms to remove Internet content that is harmful but legal, after the proposal drew strong criticism from lawmakers and civil liberties groups.

The UK has watered down its Online Safety Bill, an ambitious but controversial attempt to crack down on online racism, sexual abuse, bullying, fraud and other harmful material. Similar efforts are underway in the European Union and the United States, but the UK's was one of the most sweeping. In its original form, the bill gave regulators wide-ranging powers to sanction digital and social media companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter and TikTok.

Critics expressed concern that a requirement for the biggest platforms to remove "legal but harmful” content could lead to censorship and undermine free speech.

The Conservative government of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who took office last month, has now dropped that part of the bill, acknowledging that it could "over-criminalise” online content.

Digital Secretary Michelle Donelan said the change removed the risk that "tech firms or future governments could use the laws as a license to censor legitimate views.”

Instead, the bill says companies must set out clear terms of service, and stick to them. Companies will be free to allow adults to post and see offensive or harmful material, as long as it is not illegal. But platforms that pledge to ban racist, homophobic or other offensive content and then fail to live up to the promise can be fined up to 10% of their annual turnover.

The legislation also requires firms to help people avoid seeing content that is legal but may be harmful – such as the glorification of eating disorders, misogyny and some other forms of abuse – through warnings, content moderation or other means.

Companies also will have to show how they enforce user age limits designed to keep children from seeing harmful material.

The bill still criminalises some online activity, including cyberflashing – sending someone unwanted explicit images – and epilepsy trolling, sending flashing images that can trigger seizures. It also makes it an offense to assist or encourage self-harm, a step that follows a campaign by the family of Molly Russell, a 14-year-old who ended her life in 2017 after viewing self-harm and suicide content online.

The government hopes the changes will be enough to get the bill through Parliament, where it has languished for 18 months amid widespread opposition. – AP

Article type: free
User access status:
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!
   

Next In Tech News

Advisory firm Innisfree sues Musk's Twitter for $1.9 million in unpaid bills
ChatGPT makers launch tool to spot AI texts – but it's not very good
U.S. judge denies FTC request to stop Meta from acquiring VR firm Within
Two minutes a day to be authentic: Does BeReal show real life?
Opinion: Junk emails can be maddening, but ignoring them is the best option
Lies, racism and AI:�IT experts point to serious flaws in ChatGPT
Hackers who breached ION say ransom paid; company declines comment
Review: 'High on Life' has weapons talking in the voice of a cancelled celebrity
Twitter playing 'stupid game' to stall ex-workers' legal claims: lawyer
Self-proclaimed bitcoin inventor's $2.5 billion lawsuit can go to trial - London court

Others Also Read