Weights of discontent as MWF hit out at NSI but institute stand by decisions

PETALING JAYA: The Malaysian Weightlifting Federation (MWF) may have surpassed their three-gold medal target at the Glasgow Commonwealth Games, but the body remain unhappy with the National Sports Institute (NSI).

MWF president Datuk Ayub Rahmat (pic) revealed that less than 10 days before the competition began, several decisions made by the NSI placed unnecessary pressure on the national squad and affected their focus.

Although he did not elaborate on the decisions, they are believed to be related to the athletes’ nutritional supplements.

Despite the contention, Malaysia still bagged four gold medals through Aniq Kasdan (60kg), Aznil Bidin (65kg), Erry Hidayat (79kg) and Mohd Hafizuddin Roslin (88kg).

Irene Jane Henry also claimed a bronze in the women’s 48kg event - a first in 16 years.

“The MWF would like to express their disappointment over several actions taken by the NSI at the eleventh hour before the Games,” said Ayub in a statement.

“We believe that placed unnecessary pressure on the athletes and, to some extent, affected their focus and morale during the most crucial stage of their preparations.

“The MWF believe that every decision involving athletes’ welfare, particularly those concerning nutritional supplements, performance and sports science support, should be made in a more structured and carefully considered manner.

“It should be based on scientific evidence and in consultation with the national sports association and coaching team.

“Any last-minute changes have the potential to disrupt athletes who have spent years preparing to represent the country,” said Ayub.

Ayub also urged the NSI to review their standard operating procedures (SOPs).

“The MWF believe that world-class athletes are not built through training alone, but also through a comprehensive and consistent sports science support system.

“Investment in these areas (nutritional supplements) is not an option but a necessity if Malaysia wants to continue producing champions on the international stage,” he added.

Meanwhile, the NSI defended their actions, saying all decisions are made based on scientific assessment, professional standards, good governance, and the principles of athlete safety and welfare.

The institute added that such decisions are made in consultation with national sports associations, coaching teams and other stakeholders.

“The NSI remain committed to carrying out their responsibilities with integrity, transparency and an evidence-based approach in line with established standards and practices.

“Any views or feedback received will be considered constructively as part of our continuous efforts to improve,” the NSI said in a statement.