The Rukun Negara is not a prop for ridicule

I REFER to the viral post in which the Rukun Negara was used as a prop for mockery (“Organisers of theatre play mocking Rukun Negara should apologise”, The Star, Sept 19; online at bit.ly/4hfOKfp).

Malaysia is a diverse country. With that diversity naturally comes different views, beliefs and forms of expression. Criticism, satire and artistic expression all have their place in a democratic society.

But there is a line between questioning institutions and ridiculing the very principles intended to hold our nation together.

The Rukun Negara was conceived as a national foundation, a set of shared principles intended to provide common ground for Malaysians of every race, religion and background. That common ground matters.

We cannot continuously speak about national unity, mutual respect and social harmony while simultaneously treating the principles associated with those ideals as material for ridicule.

This does not mean the Rukun Negara should be beyond discussion. Thoughtful debate is healthy in any democracy. But there is a clear distinction between engaging critically and deliberately trivialising what it represents.

Freedom of expression is important, but it should also be exercised with a sense of responsibility. That responsibility becomes even more important for public figures, performers and content creators whose platforms allow their words and actions to reach large audiences.

At the same time, the response to offensive expression must itself remain measured, proportionate and firmly grounded in law. Defending respect for national principles should never become a justification for disproportionate action.

There is therefore a simple standard worth preserving: Criticise freely but don’t trivialise the very foundation that lets us live together as a nation.

The Rukun Negara belongs to every Malaysian. It deserves to be approached with seriousness, respect and dignity.

DARSHAN SINGH

Kuala Lumpur