Protecting Orang Asli rights to their customary land


Legal duty: Filepic of an Orang Asli village along the Simpang Pulai-Cameron Highlands route. The move to amend the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 would put right decades of legal and policy shortcomings in protecting Orang Asli land.

THE government’s plan to amend the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 (APA) is a rare opportunity to put right decades of legal and policy shortcomings in protecting Orang Asli land.

But for the reform to mean anything, it must do more than tweak procedures. It must also lock in the principles our courts have already recognised.

From the case of Adong Kuwau in 1997 to Sagong Tasi in 2002 and beyond, the Malaysian judiciary has been clear: Orang Asli have customary land rights even without formal titles.

These rights, rooted in tradition and daily survival, are protected under the Federal Constitution.

The courts have also ruled that both federal and state governments owe a fiduciary duty to safeguard these lands not as a matter of policy choice but as a binding legal obligation.

In Eddy Salim’s case (2017), the Court of Appeal reiterated that this duty extends to preventing unlawful encroachment and ensuring fair remedies. Cases such as Sangka Chuka (2016) have recognised rights over forests used for hunting and gathering, and Mesara Long Chik (2018) acknowledged “geran adat” claims arising from occupation.

Yet, on the ground, most Orang Asli territories remain outside gazetted reserves. Under the current APA, protecting these lands is left to the discretion of state governments, a loophole that has allowed logging, plantations and infrastructure projects to proceed without proper consultation or fair compensation.

The amendments must change this. They should make it a legal duty to identify, demarcate and gazette customary lands based on historical evidence and community mapping. They must embed the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) into every stage of decision-making.

And they must ensure that compensation reflects not only the value of the land but also the cultural and livelihood loss suffered when it is taken.

State governments need not wait for Putrajaya. They can act now by establishing joint committees with Orang Asli communities to map and negotiate land boundaries. Doing so would prevent disputes, honour court rulings and show real commitment to justice.

The courts have already drawn the map. The question now is whether Parliament, and the states, will follow it.

ASSOC PROF DR IZAWATI WOOK

Faculty of Syariah and Law

Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

(The writer is an academic and researcher with expertise in indigenous peoples and law and the rights of the Orang Asli.)

 

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Letters

Include earthquake mitigation in building design�
Give George Town her due
When schools become crime scenes
Wake-up call to save our frogs
Time to review legal framework of HIV services
Hidden cost of cross-border shopping
Make free drinking water mandatory in eateries
Vanishing middle – the quiet crisis reshaping the global economy
True economic growth in Langkawi lives in its hidden gems
Turning climate warnings into agricultural readiness

Others Also Read