Financial Consumer Protection under the Unfair Contract Terms


IT has been long recognised under consumer protection law that unfair contract terms should be strictly prohibited due to the unequal bargaining power between the financial institutions and the consumer. Furthermore, in 2018 case of CIMB Bank Berhad v Anthony Lawrence Bourke and Anor [2018] 1 LNS 1887, Malaysian Federal Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that commercial bank

cannot reply on exclusion clauses that restrain legal proceedings, contravening to section 29 of the Contracts Act 1950.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
consumer , protection , law , unfair , contract

Next In Letters

Government risks missing NDC 3.0 targets amid delays, weak accountability and policy uncertainty
Seeking clarification for delay in tax refunds�
Public housing needs reform to prevent social decline
True measure of a nation
The AI wave: Why literacy, not panic, is the future of AI in education
Addiction is a health issue that demands care, not cages
Address the existing recruitment crisis first
Include the voices of those who feed the nation
Safety isn’t just about systems, it’s about people
Reconsider ‘too precise’ hill test requirement

Others Also Read