Financial Consumer Protection under the Unfair Contract Terms


IT has been long recognised under consumer protection law that unfair contract terms should be strictly prohibited due to the unequal bargaining power between the financial institutions and the consumer. Furthermore, in 2018 case of CIMB Bank Berhad v Anthony Lawrence Bourke and Anor [2018] 1 LNS 1887, Malaysian Federal Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that commercial bank

cannot reply on exclusion clauses that restrain legal proceedings, contravening to section 29 of the Contracts Act 1950.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
consumer , protection , law , unfair , contract

Next In Letters

AUKU repeal must mean real change, fairer university admissions
Upholding the basics of neighbourly culture�
Run clubs should build runners up, not run them into trouble
Defence blueprint for threats we have yet to see�
DAP owes Malaysians its own answer on Bumiputera privileges and gambling, before lecturing MCA
Protect century-old Buddhist temple and Gunung Kanthan from demolition, quarrying
Humanising education through popular culture
Penang LRT contract award shows promise for local firms
Seeing audit reports with new eyes
Young people can get colon cancer, too

Others Also Read