Financial Consumer Protection under the Unfair Contract Terms


IT has been long recognised under consumer protection law that unfair contract terms should be strictly prohibited due to the unequal bargaining power between the financial institutions and the consumer. Furthermore, in 2018 case of CIMB Bank Berhad v Anthony Lawrence Bourke and Anor [2018] 1 LNS 1887, Malaysian Federal Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that commercial bank

cannot reply on exclusion clauses that restrain legal proceedings, contravening to section 29 of the Contracts Act 1950.

Save 30% for ads-free and full access now!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM9.73 only

Billed as RM9.73 for the 1st month then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month
RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60 for the 1st year then RM148 thereafters.

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
consumer , protection , law , unfair , contract

Next In Letters

Remembering Pope Francis, the Pope of Peace
Take sexual violence issues seriously
Ensuring safer vaccinations with AI
Individual action can help mitigate climate change
Combating online sexual misconduct
We must fight harder for our planet
Digital tools at hand to contain dengue
Prevention of entry, not raids, is the real solution
China stands firm with Southeast Asian countries amid US tariff war
Malaysia’s value in the global economy

Others Also Read