Financial Consumer Protection under the Unfair Contract Terms


IT has been long recognised under consumer protection law that unfair contract terms should be strictly prohibited due to the unequal bargaining power between the financial institutions and the consumer. Furthermore, in 2018 case of CIMB Bank Berhad v Anthony Lawrence Bourke and Anor [2018] 1 LNS 1887, Malaysian Federal Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that commercial bank

cannot reply on exclusion clauses that restrain legal proceedings, contravening to section 29 of the Contracts Act 1950.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
consumer , protection , law , unfair , contract

Next In Letters

Implement standards to improve access to digital space�
What the new education plan means for our children
Public speaking� a core skill for leaders
Follow Sarawak’s lead on free school transport, Putrajaya told
Let’s get kids to start the new school term with joy
Raising thinkers in the age of smart machines
Justice on paper, trauma in practice
Raising standards is easy, but closing gaps is hard
Artificial intelligence, the Fermi level, and human value
Industrial interns deserve safety too

Others Also Read