Financial Consumer Protection under the Unfair Contract Terms


IT has been long recognised under consumer protection law that unfair contract terms should be strictly prohibited due to the unequal bargaining power between the financial institutions and the consumer. Furthermore, in 2018 case of CIMB Bank Berhad v Anthony Lawrence Bourke and Anor [2018] 1 LNS 1887, Malaysian Federal Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that commercial bank

cannot reply on exclusion clauses that restrain legal proceedings, contravening to section 29 of the Contracts Act 1950.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
consumer , protection , law , unfair , contract

Next In Letters

SMEs under pressure from rising diesel costs
Improve junior doctors’ welfare for a stronger healthcare system
Targeted assistance must reach those who really need it�
‘Selangor must prioritise forests over concrete’
Truth and falsehood in the age of AI�
Proactive strategy for building a resilient nation�
Insap: Workers deserve both higher wages and jobs to earn them, not policies that cost them both
Tribunal wins meaningless when awards are ignored
Broader issues affecting GP clinics
Effectiveness of public housing depends on clear rules and strict enforcement

Others Also Read