Don’t be too harsh, we are not robots


I REFER to the letters “Read question correctly” by Samuel Yesuiah and “Mistakes can be made but be accountable too” by A Concerned Parent, concerning the English SPM 2017 Paper 1 (The Star, Nov 10).

Examiners need to focus on what the exam paper is actually testing. In this case it is proficiency in the English language, that is, good vocabulary, expressions and accuracy of language as explained by Yesuiah. If a student has fulfilled these criteria he should be given an “A” irrespective of misreading the question. I agree that he should not be penalised severely and agree to the proposal not to deduct more than three points. Yesuiah gave a good example of the need to be understanding as in the Miss World pageant finals where a candidate went on the win the contest although she spoke of Mother Teresa, who had already died, when asked to speak of a living legend she admired.

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , letters

   

Next In Letters

Fire and Rescue Department personnel deserve better pay
Buyers, beware of fake dietary supplements online
Digital citizenship in the age of artificial intelligence
Equitable pay raises for all vital for economic parity
Malaysian Indians just want their fundamental rights to be acknowledged and fulfilled
Addressing issues in plastic recycling
Example for all Malaysians
Education system still wanting
There’s focus on patriotism
Benefits of a strong IP system

Others Also Read