Regulate global investment disputes inonomy


RECENT public opinion concerning Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those discussed in recent negotiations of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), centres on a number of issues.

Notwithstanding, an objective analysis of the system and the need for a paradigm evolution is essential before there can be criticism of a system that has provided the modern legal framework for foreign investment across the globe.

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Letters

   

Next In Letters

BPA-free yet still toxic?
In solidarity with US campus protests
Well done against the odds
Fire and Rescue Department personnel deserve better pay
Equitable pay raises for all vital for economic parity
Digital citizenship in the age of artificial intelligence
Buyers, beware of fake dietary supplements online
Malaysian Indians just want their fundamental rights to be acknowledged and fulfilled
Education system still wanting
Example for all Malaysians

Others Also Read