MALAYSIA’S debt debate remains trapped in numbers: 64% of GDP, RM1.304 trillion, the statutory ceiling. Yet ceilings are political constructs, often gamed by guarantees and off-budget tricks (see "Debt, Deceit and Delay" by EMIR Research). The more vital question is not how high the ceiling sits, but how strong the floor is. What real fiscal space does Malaysia have once interest costs, rollover obligations, and household burdens are counted? And, crucially, what do we gain in return for every ringgit borrowed?
For too long, debt has been framed as either virtue or vice, when in reality it is a choice. The real test lies in whether borrowing strengthens or weakens sovereignty. Unproductive debt (bailouts, opaque guarantees, rent-seeking GLCs) drains public wealth and erodes trust. Productive debt—sovereign green bonds, food security investment, strategic technology scale-ups—builds resilience and generates returns. Debt itself is not the enemy; indiscipline is.
