New Zealand mosque shooter's bid to appeal convictions denied by court


FILE PHOTO: Brenton Tarrant, the gunman who shot and killed worshippers in the Christchurch mosque attacks, listens as Crown prosecutor Mark Zarifeh delivers his submission during Tarrant's sentencing at the High Court in Christchurch, New Zealand, August 27, 2020. John Kirk-Anderson/Pool via REUTERS/ File Photo

WELLINGTON, April 30 (Reuters) - New Zealand's ⁠Court of Appeal on Thursday denied convicted Christchurch mosque shooter Brenton Tarrant's ⁠bid to appeal his convictions, ruling his attempt to overturn guilty ‌pleas for the country's deadliest mass shooting was "utterly devoid of merit".

Tarrant, an Australian national, pleaded guilty on March 26, 2020, to 51 charges of murder, 40 counts of attempted murder and one charge of ​committing a terrorist attack over the 2019 shootings ⁠at two Christchurch mosques. He was ⁠sentenced that August to life imprisonment without parole.

The court said Tarrant filed his appeal ⁠in ‌November 2022, 505 working days late. His lawyers argued at a February hearing that his guilty pleas were not voluntary and resulted from prison ⁠conditions that allegedly affected his mental state.

But the three-judge ​court rejected their argument. ‌A media release published alongside the judgement said the court found his ⁠account was inconsistent ​and contradicted by prison records, mental health assessments and evidence from his former trial lawyers.

Tarrant's lawyers from March 2019 to July 2020 told the court in February that he showed ⁠signs of anxiety during the original proceedings but ​did not appear depressed, media reported at the time.

The Court of Appeal said Tarrant was not suffering from mental incapacity when he pleaded guilty and was not coerced or ⁠pressured into doing so.

After the February hearing, Tarrant tried to abandon the appeal against his conviction, according to the court, which chose not to allow this citing significant public interest. The court said Tarrant also dismissed his lawyers, who have since ​withdrawn as counsel. The lawyers have been given permanent ⁠name suppression and could not be reached for comment.

However, the court did allow the ​abandonment of his sentence appeal. The judges said the ‌interests of society, particularly the victims, strongly ​favoured refusing more time to appeal. The decision means the appeal process is now at an end.

(Reporting by Lucy Craymer; Editing by Kate Mayberry)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In World

Trump warns Iran blockade could last months, sending oil soaring
Analysis-US court ruling clears Republican path to redraw House districts
Libya says 17 migrants perish at sea, nine missing feared dead
Brazil's Senate rejects nomination of Lula's solicitor general for Supreme Court seat
Austria falling short in fight against money laundering, says global watchdog
21 Malagasy workers missing in Mauritius: ministry
Trump says US reviewing possible reduction of its troops in Germany
ELTE Confucius Institute marks 20 years of promoting China-Hungary exchanges
Surveillance drone downed near US embassy in Baghdad, Iraqi security sources say
Roundup: Starmer "deeply concerned" about Golders Green stabbing amid rising antisemitic incidents

Others Also Read