Sensitive M&A: A file picture showing a rally by US Steel employees in support of Nippon Steel’s US$15bil acquisition early this month. Moves to block Nippon Steel will be ‘very unsettling’ and may dent trust between the United States and Japan. — AP
JAPANESE firms are set to scrutinise overseas deals more intently after US resistance to Nippon Steel’s US$15bil US Steel purchase, according to advisers.
Any US move to block Japan’s Nippon Steel would be “very unsettling”, one of the front-runners to become the next Japanese premier told Reuters, and could dent trust between the allies.
Reuters reported last week that the White House is close to announcing President Joe Biden would block the US Steel deal on national security grounds.
Both buyers and sellers of assets were already taking more time analysing political trends and scrutinising whether a target is in an industry that might trigger state intervention, one Tokyo-based banker told Reuters.
As one of Washington’s closest allies, Japan has not had any issues with US regulators in recent years and companies in the country have been assessing assets abroad given a falling yen and stagnant economy at home.
But last week, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) said in a letter to Nippon Steel and US Steel that their proposed deal would create national security risks by hurting the steel supply needed for critical US projects.
CFIUS has stepped up its scrutiny since Chinese companies went on a US shopping spree about a decade ago, snapping up assets such as the Waldorf Hotel and tech firm Ingram Micro.
Some advisers said that the Nippon Steel deal was complicated by the US presidential election, with many Republican and Democratic lawmakers voicing opposition to it, but that this could subside after November’s vote.“Whoever wins the election will be under pressure from the financial markets to accept these deals,” said Euan Rellie, New York-based co-founder and managing partner of investment advisory firm BDA Partners.
Nevertheless, Japanese companies would be “really, really concerned and shaken up” by the Nippon Steel situation, said a Tokyo-based senior mergers and acquisitions (M&A) banker, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.
If the Nippon Steel deal collapses, break-up fees might increase and buyers would become more cautious, they added.
Outbound M&A from Japan to the United States, in particular, is up nearly 160% to US$32.1bil so far this year, accounting for 71.4% of Japan’s total outbound M&A deal value, versus 38.7% a year earlier, Dealogic data showed.
“The CFIUS decision in this case should not change the policy trend of friend-shoring or Japan’s status as a key ally country in the CFIUS review process,” said Weiheng Chen, a senior partner at law firm Wilson Sonsini.
Japan saw a 45% jump in outbound acquisition deal value last year to US$65.8bil, the Dealogic data showed, as companies looked to tap alternate revenue streams to soften the impact of a deflationary domestic economy.
Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of US Steel would have been the third-biggest acquisition of a US firm by Japan Inc in a decade after the US$21bil takeover of Speedway in 2020, and US$16bil of Beam in 2014, the data showed.
Rellie said that blocking cross-border M&A would be “bad economics and bad policy” as a “tidal wave” of Asian clients paying up for US and European assets had been forecast. —Reuters
Kane Wu, Yantoultra Ngui and Miho Uranaka write for Reuters. The views expressed here are the writers’ own.
