Whither global finance? Look at the US$


Volatility in the US dollar, return of higher inflation, debt defaults or cyber-crashes all could throw the global financial system in jeopardy. The US depends mostly on printing US dollars to solve emerging problems. US public debt grew US$4.5 trillion in 2020 alone.

WHERE is Wall Street going in the post-pandemic world? Finance is supposed to serve the real economy (Main Street), but the US and global economies are in the midst of a pandemic and recession, while Wall Street profits are higher than ever.

The pandemic has exposed many of the flaws of the current financial system. The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman called this “socialism for the rich and capitalism for the rest”. How does this work? The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to tackle social inequality, climate change and living standards by 2030 demands major reforms to the global financial system. Financing for development is daunting for various systemic or structural reasons. But most of the barriers are political.

The rise of neoliberal free market philosophy since the 1970s boosted globalisation, which pushed for deregulation of finance, labour, production and service markets, alongside trade liberalisation. Globalisation has benefited many countries, but the benefits were unevenly distributed. Financialisation or globalisation of Wall Street practices rose with global growth of American banking and finance. In the 1960s, the American corporate push to Europe and Japan created the euro-dollar market.

American banks became global bankers, receiving deposits in US dollars and lending with fat margins back to banks and corporations globally. In the 1970s, American banks innovated into investment and private banking. Unfortunately, their excess lending to Latin American governments led to the 1980s Latin American debt crisis. When competition arose from Japanese banks, American and European banks created the first Basel Accord on bank supervision to ensure that all banks competed on equal terms.

It was Japanese bank excess lending domestically and in South-East Asia that fostered the Asian financial crisis of 1997/1999. During this period of financial de-regulation, financing innovation came in the form of derivatives (what Warren Buffett called weapons of mass destruction) that turbo-charged leverage. All this came down like a house of cards in the 2007/2009 global financial crisis (GFC). The leading central banks stepped in to rescue the system but instead of punishing the bad guys, their monetary creation lifted all boats. With interest rates down to near zero, amidst huge liquidity, governments gave up austerity and fiscal deficits rose.

The result was hyper-financialisation, growing concentration, inequality, worsening climate change and fatter profits for Wall Street. Note that after 2007/2009, Swiss, German, British and European banks all ceded investment banking to the top few American investment and universal banks like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley.

The post-GFC Basel 3 regulatory reforms covered the systemic banks but completely missed out the non-bank financial institutions. The top American asset managers now manage more assets than even the largest Chinese banks.

The link between financialisation and growing inequality is often under-appreciated. First, as Thomas Piketty famously revealed, inequality rises as long as “r” (the return on private capital) is larger than “g” (GDP growth rate). Financialisation plays a critical role on “r”, because the return on equity can be turbocharged through leverage. Second, as UNCTAD data showed, between 1995-2018, developing countries earned 2% less on their gross external assets while paying 2% more on their external debt, giving rich country lenders essentially 4% margin. This margin also happens at the retail level in almost all markets.

Third, capitalism values capital more than labour, so the share of wage in total income has declined by 5 percentage points to 52% between 1990 to 2017. The profits of the corporate and financial sector have increased proportionately, but they are largely concentrated today in the tech and services sectors in the rich economies. In short, for the poor and most emerging economies (the rest), financial capitalism meant losing out in their wages, income and savings.

Financialisation has become a “head I win, tails you lose” for the poor, with central banks underwriting the rich with massive quantitative easing. No wonder populist protests have broken out in both poor and rich countries alike. The current mess can be summed up as a situation where we have the highest global liquidity in history and yet we cannot finance our long-term development needs nor solve our rising inequality.

As central banks can print US$3 trillion in 2020 with no impact on inflation, money or liquidity is not an issue. Regulatory constraints and banker caution means they do not want to lend out long term and take more risks. The poor everywhere is lamenting like the Ancient Mariner dying of thirst adrift in the sea: “Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink.”

The US dollar plays a central role in the current global financial system. The US is the too-big-to-fail debtor to the rest of the world, with a net liability of US$14 trillion at end of September 2020, thus providing important US dollar liquidity for the world. This grew by US$3 trillion in the last 12 months alone. Since the US dollar forms 65% of total foreign exchange reserves and 80% of developing country international securities issued, the future of the US dollar is critical to both global economic recovery and financial stability.

Volatility in the US dollar, return of higher inflation, debt defaults or cyber-crashes all could throw the global financial system in jeopardy. The US depends mostly on printing US dollars to solve emerging problems. US public debt grew US$4.5 trillion in 2020 alone.

The Fed can print, but will the rest of the world be willing to fund further debt growth without higher risk premia? Simply put, the global financial system and real economy are entangled with the US dollar, which is both a US exorbitant privilege but a global boon and bane.

You cannot get global recovery without major reforms to the global financial system, but you cannot get the latter without US consent and co-operation. Thus, the ball is truly in the court of the Biden Administration. To restore US growth and leadership, and to secure the US dollar’s future to continue financing US structural debt, the US needs the rest of the world, as much as the world needs the US. No one should envy US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in the coming days.

Andrew Sheng is a Distinguished Fellow of Fung Global Institute, a global think tank based in Hong Kong. Views expressed here are his own.

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

   

Next In Business News

Singapore March core inflation at 3.1% y/y, below forecast
Oil prices stabilise, Middle East tensions remain in focus
Japan issues strongest warning yet on readiness to intervene in currency market
Gaza warmongering and genocide
FBM KLCI extends rebound
Sow seeds of resilience
Parched of solutions
Shore up water security
Ringgit opens slightly easier against US$ ahead of macro data
Topmix jumps 32% on ACE Market debut

Others Also Read