WHILE millions of Americans were losing their jobs, the stock market in April produced its best monthly return in over 30 years.
In the past eight weeks, 36 million Americans have filed unemployment claims. The US gross domestic product (GDP) plunged by 4.8% in the first quarter of this year, yet the US stock market surged by 13.2% in April, the largest monthly increase since 1987.
“Although this may seem unintuitive, there is, in fact, a large body of evidence which shows that there is a very weak relationship between equity returns and economic growth. You should not expect the two to move in tandem, ” says Schroders strategist, research and analytics Sean Markowicz.
He says several factors explain this behaviour. Firstly, markets are forward-looking.
The most important reason is that a company’s stock market value can be thought of as the present value of all its future earnings. These are related to economic growth but not on a one-to-one basis. “Its value reflects what is happening right now, but also what is forecast to happen next year, the year after, and so on. Stock markets are forward-looking.
“In contrast, much economic data tells you about what has happened in the past, ” explains Markowicz in his Talking Point report for May.
To give an example, GDP growth figures are not released until after the quarter has ended. This means any news that impacts profit expectations can move the market before it hits companies’ bottom lines.
“This is exactly what has happened this year. US stocks fell by 24% in the first three months of the year in anticipation of the economic slump that has subsequently been realised. A lot of bad news was already priced in when we entered April, ” he says.
Similarly, while it is easy to be fixated on the current dire situation, this is not expected to continue indefinitely.
As they reflect all future earnings of a company, stock prices not only capture the near-term negative outlook, but also a subsequent recovery (even if the shape of that recovery is open to much debate).
Besides stock prices being forward looking, there has also been an additional catalyst which has spurred markets higher in recent weeks. This has led to an even greater disconnect between the market and economy.
This catalyst is the huge stimulus package that central banks and governments have unleashed.
The US Federal Reserve has slashed short-term interest rates to zero, pledged to buy government bonds in unlimited amounts, and to buy specified quantities of investment grade corporate debt and high yield exchange-traded funds.
“This has been paired with a large fiscal response, including the expansion of unemployment benefits, direct money transfers and loans to small businesses.
“The unprecedented measures have helped shore up stock prices by boosting market liquidity, lowering the cost of borrowing, providing financing to corporates and raising business confidence, ” says Markowicz.
Lower interest rates are also positive for markets because they increase the value of future earnings that would accrue to shareholders. When this happens, stock prices tend to appreciate in value.
Does this mean we are out of the woods?
Unlikely, says Markowicz.
Despite all the liquidity sloshing around, that may not be enough to keep businesses afloat and get consumers to start shopping again.
Revenues are likely to remain under pressure for the foreseeable future. Entire industries are exposed. Many companies are likely to struggle to afford debt repayments, increasing the risk of a wave of defaults and bankruptcies.
“With few companies offering earnings guidance amidst the economic uncertainty, markets could be due for another correction if things turn out to be worse than expected, ” he added.
It is also worth remembering that, although markets have partially recovered losses at the index level, this is not true for all sectors.
Depending on their economic sensitivity to the lockdown, there are clear winners and losers emerging. The next phase could well see this trend of diverging fortunes persisting. Investors need to remain on guard.
Did you find this article insightful?
100% readers found this article insightful